Table IV.
The percentage of local codes that had LOINC mappings in the original submissions and after manual mapping and review
Before review | After review | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Concept type coverage |
Concept token coverage |
Concept type coverage |
Concept token coverage |
|
ARUP | 0.44 | 0.59 | 0.63(0.73)* | 0.72 (0.79)* |
Intermountain | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.83(0.90)* | 0.80 (0.99)* |
Regenstrief | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.88(0.93)* | 0.90 (0.997)* |
After excluding two types of local codes:”narrative results” and “internal use only”.