Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Stat Comput Simul. 2009 Oct 1;79(10):1245–1257. doi: 10.1080/00949650802255618

Table 4.

Comparison of imputation methods for β = (−0.5, 0.1) under the Cox model with heavy interval censoring.

EXACT Imputation methods
RIGHT MID MEAN MEDIAN MODE RAND MI
Mean of β̂1 −0.5036 (−0.5021) −0.4832 (−0.4897) −0.4938 (−0.4764) −0.4829 (−0.4919) −0.4813 (−0.4920) −0.4823 (−0.4838) −0.4792 (−0.4845) −0.4786 (−0.4849)
SD(β̂1) 0.1569 (0.1606) 0.1578 (0.1589) 0.1600 (0.1614) 0.1569 (0.1596) 0.1561 (0.1597) 0.1590 (0.1610) 0.1585 (0.1619) 0.1554 (0.1568)
Mean ASE(β̂1) 0.1554 (0.1553) 0.1552 (0.1552) 0.1553 (0.1553) 0.1551 (0.1553) 0.1551 (0.1553) 0.1552 (0.1553) 0.1551 (0.1553) 0.1585 (0.1605)
MSE 0.0246 (0.0258) 0.0252 (0.0253) 0.0256 (0.0266) 0.0249 (0.0255) 0.0247 (0.0256) 0.0256 (0.0262) 0.0255 (0.0264) 0.0246 (0.0248)
Coverage of 95% CI (ASE) 0.949 0.943 0.946 0.952 0.953 0.940 0.948 0.957
Coverage of 95% EBCI 0.938 0.944 0.948 0.949 0.955 0.953 0.942
Coverage of 95% CI (ASE) (0.942) (0.947) (0.944) (0.945) (0.945) (0.949) (0.935) (0.956)
Coverage of 95% EBCI (−) (0.947) (0.943) (0.945) (0.947) (0.949) (0.949) (0.940)
Power (ASE) 0.904 0.881 0.882 0.876 0.878 0.882 0.864 0.861
Power (EBCI) 0.890 0.887 0.884 0.880 0.875 0.877 0.885
Power (ASE) (0.912) (0.903) (0.870) (0.901) (0.903) (0.890) (0.887) (0.883)
Power (EBCI) (−) (0.912) (0.872) (0.908) (0.906) (0.898) (0.899) (0.909)
Size (ASE) 0.044 0.048 0.052 0.052 0.052 0.056 0.048 0.040
Size (EBCI) 0.059 0.060 0.057 0.055 0.052 0.054 0.059
Size (ASE) (0.060) (0.062) (0.053) (0.064) (0.064) (0.055) (0.061) (0.042)
Size (EBCI) (−) (0.065) (0.053) (0.062) (0.066) (0.051) (0.055) (0.060)

Note: Numbers not in parenthesis are from GA setting; numbers in parenthesis are from GB setting. Sample size n = 200, 1000 simulated data sets, and 1000 bootstraps per simulated dataset.