Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):185–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01183.x

Table 2.

The Impact of Medicare Part D on Likelihood of Use among Those with Hypertension Diagnosis in 2003

2-Year Part D Effect

Unadjusted Likelihood of Use* Propensity Score Weighting Multivariate Regression



Pre Post Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Panel A: Likelihood of use
 Any antihypertensive medications
  Comparison
   No cap 88.1 89.1 Reference Reference
  Intervention groups
   No coverage 59.8 69.7 1.40 (1.25,1.56) 1.43 (1.27,1.6)
   U.S.$150 cap 82.2 84.6 1.08 (0.95,1.23) 1.07 (0.94,1.23)
   U.S.$350 cap 86.1 86.9 0.97 (0.89,1.05) 0.97 (0.9,1.05)
 ACE
  Comparison
   No cap 29.5 28.5 Reference Reference
  Intervention groups
   No coverage 16.7 20.3 1.34 (1.20,1.49) 1.33 (1.2,1.48)
   U.S.$150 cap 25.9 26.4 1.08 (0.98,1.18) 1.09 (0.99,1.19)
   U.S.$350 cap 29.1 29.1 1.05 (1.00,1.10) 1.05 (1,1.11)
 ARB
  Comparison
   No cap 27.7 29.8 Reference Reference
  Intervention groups
   No coverage 10.9 17.3 1.53 (1.35,1.75) 1.52 (1.34,1.72)
   U.S.$150 cap 19.4 22.0 1.05 (0.96,1.15) 1.06 (0.96,1.16)
   U.S.$350 cap 24.7 26.6 0.99 (0.95,1.04) 1 (0.95,1.04)
 CCB
  Comparison
   No cap 31.9 32.9 Reference Reference
  Intervention groups
   No coverage 18.7 22.6 1.21 (1.10,1.33) 1.19 (1.09,1.31)
   U.S.$150 cap 28.4 29.7 1.02 (0.94,1.11) 1.03 (0.95,1.12)
   U.S.$350 cap 29.8 31.5 1.03 (0.98,1.08) 1.03 (0.98,1.08)
β-blockers
  Comparison
   No cap 41.5 45.5 Reference Reference
  Intervention groups
   No coverage 23.6 34.3 1.44 (1.30,1.59) 1.45 (1.32,1.6)
   U.S.$150 cap 34.9 41.5 1.13 (1.04,1.22) 1.14 (1.05,1.23)
   U.S.$350 cap 38.1 43.6 1.07 (1.02,1.12) 1.08 (1.03,1.13)
 Diuretics
  Comparison
   No cap 37.8 39.8 Reference Reference
  Intervention groups
   No coverage 26.0 33.8 1.34 (1.21,1.47) 1.38 (1.25,1.53)
   U.S.$150 cap 36.1 39.7 1.07 (0.98,1.17) 1.08 (0.98,1.18)
   U.S.$350 cap 36.4 38.4 1.00 (0.95,1.06) 1.01 (0.96,1.06)
2-year Part D Effect

Unadjusted* Propensity Score Weighting Multivariate Regression



Pre Post Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI)
 Panel B: Average daily counts
 Any antihypertensive medications
  Comparison
   No cap 1.53 1.66 Reference Reference
  Intervention groups
   No coverage 0.75 1.18 0.29 (0.24,0.33) 0.30 (0.26,0.34)
   U.S.$150 cap 1.27 1.46 0.05 (0.01,0.08) 0.06 (0.02,0.09)
   U.S.$350 cap 1.38 1.51 0.00 (−0.02,0.02) 0.00 (−0.02,0.02)
*

Pre- and postcomparisons are unadjusted raw numbers.

“2-year Part D Effects” are adjusted difference-in-difference estimates from GEE regression models, which measured changes in likelihood of use 2 years pre- and 2 years post-Part D in each intervention group, relative to the changes in outcomes in the comparison group. One set of results were models with propensity score weighting, and the other set of results were from multivariate regressions without propensity score weighting. In calculating propensity score, the following variables were included in the logistic regression: zip-code level of income, race, residing in the urban areas, and individual-level variables such as age categories, sex, and 2004 and 2005 risk scores. Then an inverse weight was applied for each individual in the analytic GEE models. In the multivariate regression, shown for comparison, the above variables used to calculate propensity score were included in the model as covariates.

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin-II receptor blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; CI, confidence interval; GEE, general estimating equations.