. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 7.

Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr A. 2010 Oct 31;1218(1):64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.096

Table 5.

Case 3: Results for Optimization of Mixture D^a

¹t_g	¹L	¹F	¹ φ _o	¹ φ _fin	¹n_c	Δ(¹t)	Δ(¹t)/¹t_g	¹ ϖ	²t_g	β	¹n'_c	²n_c	n^'_c,2D
Method 1 optimization of mixture D¹
5	9.3	1.26	0.00	0.80	101	4.0	0.80	0.040	11.52	11.3	9.0	16	146
12	14.3	0.82	0.00	0.80	135	9.6	0.80	0.071	11.94	6.5	20.8	17	348
24	20.3	0.58	0.00	0.80	163	19.2	0.80	0.118	12.84	4.2	38.5	18	682
49	25.2	0.46	0.00	0.76	192	40.9	0.83	0.213	15.16	2.8	68.9	20	1381
Method 2 optimization of mixture D¹
5	3.0	3.89	0.00	0.50	53	4.9	0.98	0.091	12.29	5.2	10.2	17	175
12	4.8	2.43	0.00	0.51	81	11.6	0.97	0.144	13.44	3.6	22.3	18	408
24	7.9	1.49	0.00	0.55	118	23.0	0.96	0.195	14.70	2.9	40.1	20	786
49	12.7	0.92	0.00	0.58	163	46.5	0.95	0.286	17.02	2.4	69.0	22	1500

The meanings of symbols in Table 5 are the same as those in Table 3.

Mixture D has the least retained solute which elutes at a time greater than ¹t_o given ¹φ_o=0.0.