Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 7;6(2):e16460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016460

Figure 1. Comparing observed ILI incidence and model simulations.

Figure 1

a Weekly ILI incidence as reported to the surveillance system (green) and weekly incidence simulated by a “simple” SIR model (blue). Sub-panel shows the same curves in a logarithmic scale. Parameter values assumed in the simulation are: the generation time Inline graphic days [48][50] and Inline graphic, according to a serological survey on the Italian population [47]. Parameter values estimated via model fit are: Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. b Weekly ILI incidence as reported to the surveillance system (green) and weekly incidence simulated by a SIR model assuming a time-dependent transmission rate (blue). Sub-panel shows the same curves in a logarithmic scale. Assumed parameters are: Inline graphic days and Inline graphic. Values of the fitted parameters are: Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic for weeks 38–41.58 and Inline graphic for weeks 41.58–51. c Weekly ILI incidence as reported to the surveillance system (green) and weekly incidence simulated by the proposed model (red). Sub-panel shows the same curves in a logarithmic scale. Assumed parameters are: Inline graphic days, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The values of the fitted parameters are: Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. In addition, the estimates of the reporting factor Inline graphic as obtained by fitting the three models and reported in a, b and c (namely, 17.4%, 16.7% and 16.9%, respectively) are in good agreement with the range 18%–20.2% estimated in [30].