Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 14;30(1):55–61. doi: 10.1007/s10840-010-9530-4

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Reported arrhythmia pattern and duration in the questionnaire (N = 235) after ablation (percentages) with cryoenergy (left) and RF (right). There are no differences in both parameters for the two approaches