TABLE 1.
Participants’ pre-treatment language test data
| Test | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | Participant Mean* | Standard Deviation* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Aphasia Battery | |||||||||
| Aphasia Quotient | 66.5 | 62.3 | 79.7 | 69.9 | 71.4 | 72.2 | 79.1 | 72.4 | 6.44 |
| Fluency Score | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | .52 |
| Auditory Comprehension | 8.6 | 6.75 | 8.15 | 8.85 | 9.1 | 7.5 | 9.65 | 8.33 | 1.08 |
| Repetition Score | 5.2 | 6.4 | 8.8 | 7.0 | 5.6 | 8.4 | 8.2 | 7.4 | 1.27 |
| Naming Score | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.9 | 7.1 | 8.0 | 7.2 | 8.7 | 7.65 | .67 |
| Philadelphia Comprehension Battery for Aphasia | |||||||||
| Lexical Comprehension | 98 | 98 | 95 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 99 | 1.98 |
| Sentence Comprehension | 82 | 75 | 88 | 80 | 82 | 80 | 93 | 83 | 6.45 |
| Reversible Sentences | 70 | 63 | 77 | 77 | 53 | 63 | 87 | 70 | 12.44 |
| Lexical Sentences | 90 | 83 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 97 | 100 | 94 | 8.47 |
| Actives/Subject Relatives | 85 | 85 | 90 | 80 | 40 | 80 | 95 | 78 | 19.66 |
| Passives/Object Relatives | 75 | 80 | 85 | 75 | 60 | 30 | 95 | 71 | 23.11 |
| Northwestern Verb Production Bettery Total Scores | |||||||||
| Comprehension | 91 | 98 | 100 | 81 | 100 | 91 | 94 | 94 | 7.29 |
| Confrontation Naming | 40 | 83 | 47 | 40 | 87 | 73 | 57 | 65 | 19.41 |
| Elicited Naming Sentence Production | 30 | 60 | 85 | 83 | 85 | 49 | 100 | 77 | 18.79 |
| Total Verb production | 91 | 83 | 84 | 86 | 84 | 90 | 96 | 87 | 5.00 |
| Agent argument production | 93 | 87 | 89 | 57 | 94 | 90 | 96 | 86 | 14.35 |
| Theme argument production | 62 | 73 | 53 | 91 | 84 | 82 | 71 | 76 | 13.32 |
| Goal argument production | 36 | 7 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 86 | 13 | 42 | 28.74 |
*
Indicates that participants’ means and standard deviations are figured on Participants 2–7 only. Participant 1 did not complete the study, thus her scores were not included in the statistical analysis.