Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2003 Jan;17(3):213–241. doi: 10.1080/729255456

TABLE 5.

Statistical analyses of pre- and post-treatment language test data

Language test subtest Mean (SD)
T score Probability
Pre Post
Western Aphasia Battery
Aphasia Quotient 72.4(6.44) 76.6(4.39) − 2.762 .040*
Fluency Score 5(.52) 5(.41) − 1.000 .363
Auditory Comprehension Score 8.33(1.08) 8.96(.49) − 2.094 .090
Repetition Score 7.4(1.27) 7.8(1.07) − 2.740 .041*
Naming Score 7.65(.67) 8.05(.67) − 3.873 .012**
Northwestern Verb Production Battery
Comprehension 95(7.29) 97(2.42) − 1.172 .294
Confrontation Naming 65(19.41) 72(13.26) − .850 .434
Verb Usage in Sentence Production 87(5.00) 95(4.76) − 3.911 .011**
% Correct Obligatory One-place Verbs 89(17.04) 98(4.49) − 1.746 .141
% Correct Obligatory Two-place Verbs 78(13.91) 98(4.49) − 3.379 .020**
% Correct Optional Two-place Verbs 85(7.68) 80(15.19) .862 .428
% Correct Obligatory Three-place Verbs 14(23.91) 53(23.15) − 3.766 .013**
% Correct Optional Three-place Verbs 50(24.60) 61(31.06) − .732 .497
*

Significant at p < .05 level.

**

Significant at p < .02 level.