Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Sep;41(3):181–190. doi: 10.1363/4118109

TABLE 5.

Logistic Regression Using Scales of Relationship Qualities to Predict Consistent Condom Use Among Teens in Sexually Active Dating Relationships

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR OR OR
Intercept 6.33 3.57 2.81
Negative Relationship Qualities § 0.91** 0.90**
Positive Relationship Qualities § 0.93** 0.92**
Relationship Demographics
 Relationship is Current (vs. Ended) 1.33 2.31* 1.90
 Duration (Est. in Weeks) 0.99* 0.99 0.99
 Age Asymmetry 1.17 1.25 1.25
 Racial/Ethnic Asymmetry 1.66 1.34 1.57
 School Asymmetry 0.75 0.75 0.82
 Sexual Experience Asymmetry 1.05 1.14 1.08
Respondent’s Sociodemographic Characteristics
 Age 0.98 0.99 0.99
 Gender (Female) 0.49* 0.55 0.50*
 Race Ethnicity:
  Hispanic 0.60 0.80 0.65
  Non-Hispanic White - - - - - - - - -
  Non-Hispanic Black 1.42 1.27 1.22
  Non-Hispanic Other 0.41 0.33 0.38
 Family Structure:
  Single Parent 0.90 0.69 0.81
  Two Biological Parents - - - - - - - - -
  Stepfamily 0.45 0.48 0.43
  Other Living Situation 0.49 0.39 0.42
 Parent’s Education:
  Less than High School 0.73 0.68 0.73
  High School - - - - - - - - -
  >High School, No 4-Year Degree 0.46* 0.48* 0.46*
  4-Year College Degree+ 0.41* 0.39* 0.39*
 Parental Monitoring 1.00 0.98 0.99
 Parental Communication Re. Sex 1.03 1.04 1.04
 Self-Esteem 0.94 0.96 0.95
 Grades 1.03 1.08 1.06
 Virgin Before This Relationship 1.33 1.27 1.26
 Delinquency 0.96* 0.95** 0.96*

p < .10,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001

§

All qualities are coded so that higher scores indicate more of that quality, be it positive or negative.

Source: Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study Wave 1, N=269