Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 26;31(4):1323–1332. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5383-10.2011

Table 1.

PKA anchoring affects hippocampal neuron resting membrane properties

Peak potential (mV) Steady-state potential (mV) “Sag” potential (mV) Input resistance (MΩ)
Ctrl (n = 10) −104.5 ± 3.1 −94.5 ± 3.3 9.8 ± 0.3 149.2 ± 5.8
Ht31 (n = 8) −83.7 ± 2.8* −74.4 ± 2.6* 9.3 ± 0.9 82.5 ± 2.6*
FK506 (n = 9) −119.7 ± 4.3* −110.2 ± 4.2* 9.5 ± 0.3 198.6 ± 8.7*
4-AP (n = 12) −128.1 ± 6.6* −118.7 ± 6.7* 9.4 ± 0.9 245.7 ± 6.5*
4-AP + Ht31 (n = 13) −124.1 ± 3.8* −114.4 ± 3.8* 9.7 ± 0.5 210.9 ± 6.7*
4-AP + FK506 (n = 12) −127.8 ± 3.7* −118.2 ± 4.8* 9.6 ± 0.3 232.3 ± 10.4*

Subthreshold voltage transients were generated in response to a +200 pA, 1000 ms current injection for control neurons, or neurons treated with Ht31 peptide, FK506, 4-AP, 4-AP + Ht31, or 4-AP + FK506. Compared with control neurons, both peak and steady-state responses are reduced in the Ht31 treatment group (n = 10 for Ctrl, n = 8 for Ht31 peptide) and enhanced in the FK506, 4-AP, 4-AP + Ht31, and 4-AP + FK506 groups, affecting cellular input resistance. The difference potential or “sag” between peak and steady-state voltages did not differ between experimental groups, indicating that the hyperpolarization-activated nonspecific cation current, Ih, was not affected.

*p < 0.05.