Table 1. Contributions of proximate causes to the HIV decline in Zimbabwe.
Proximate Cause | Population-Level Effectivenessa | Extent of Changeb | Consistency in Timing of Changec | Major Contribution |
Behavioral | ||||
Age at first sex - postponement | Low | Low [QN] | Consistent | Unlikely |
Partner numbers - reduction | High | High [QN & QL] | Consistent | Likely |
Condom use - increase (in non-marital partnerships) | High (if consistent use) | Moderate [P, QN, QL] | Earlier | Plausible |
Biological | ||||
Transmission probability - reductiond | High | Low [QN & P] | Earlier | Unlikely |
Form(s) of evidence supporting conclusion: M, epidemiological modeling; QN, survey data; P, program data; QL, qualitative data. See Text S1 for details.
Extent to which changes in the factor concerned can reduce HIV transmission at the population level, as measured and modeled in scientific studies [M & QN].
Extent to which changes in the given behavioral or biological determinant (by population sub-group) have occurred as observed in longitudinal surveys and/or program data.
Extent to which the changes in risk behavior etc. occurred during the period of most rapid reduction in risk as determined by the epidemiological modeling assessment (i.e., about 1999–2003).
Transmission probability could be affected by, for example, levels of blood safety, prevalence of other sexually transmitted infections, HIV medications, or male circumcision.