Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 8;8(2):e1000414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000414

Table 1. Contributions of proximate causes to the HIV decline in Zimbabwe.

Proximate Cause Population-Level Effectivenessa Extent of Changeb Consistency in Timing of Changec Major Contribution
Behavioral
Age at first sex - postponement Low Low [QN] Consistent Unlikely
Partner numbers - reduction High High [QN & QL] Consistent Likely
Condom use - increase (in non-marital partnerships) High (if consistent use) Moderate [P, QN, QL] Earlier Plausible
Biological
Transmission probability - reductiond High Low [QN & P] Earlier Unlikely

Form(s) of evidence supporting conclusion: M, epidemiological modeling; QN, survey data; P, program data; QL, qualitative data. See Text S1 for details.

a

Extent to which changes in the factor concerned can reduce HIV transmission at the population level, as measured and modeled in scientific studies [M & QN].

b

Extent to which changes in the given behavioral or biological determinant (by population sub-group) have occurred as observed in longitudinal surveys and/or program data.

c

Extent to which the changes in risk behavior etc. occurred during the period of most rapid reduction in risk as determined by the epidemiological modeling assessment (i.e., about 1999–2003).

d

Transmission probability could be affected by, for example, levels of blood safety, prevalence of other sexually transmitted infections, HIV medications, or male circumcision.