Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Rural Health. 2010 Summer;26(2):175–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00279.x

Table 2.

Crude Rates of Birth Outcomes and Infant Mortality for First Nations and Non-First Nations in Urban Areas and in Rural Areas by Degree of Urban Influence, Manitoba 1991–2000

Outcome Rural by Urban Influence
Urban P Values, Tests for Differences Trends
No Weak Moderate/Strong
First Nations
 All live births, N 5,507 8,623 1,899 9,114
 Preterm birth, % 7.5 7.7 7.8 9.1 .001 .0002
 SGA birth, % 7.0 7.2 7.3 8.7 .0003 <.0001
 Low birth weight, % 4.7 4.5 5.0 6.0 <.0001 <.0001
 High birth weight, % 18.8 20.2 21.9 18.9 .005 .69
 LGA birth, % 18.1 18.3 19.7 17.1 .02 .06
 Neonatal death, per 1,000 5.1 3.5 3.2 3.3 .32 .15
 Postneonatal death, per 1,000 5.7 6.4 4.8 6.2 .82 .81
 Infant death, per 1,000 10.7 9.9 7.9 9.5 .74 .48
Non-First Nations
 All live births, N 2,958 17,862 18,534 86,375
 Preterm birth, % 7.0 6.3 6.5 7.8 <.0001 <.0001
 SGA birth, % 8.7 8.4 8.4 10.5 .0003 .0003
 Low birth weight, % 5.4 5.1 4.9 5.9 <.0001 <.0001
 High birth weight, % 18.8 17.3 15.6 13.1 <.0001 <.0001
 LGA birth, % 15.0 12.9 12.2 10.6 <.0001 <.0001
 Neonatal death, per 1,000 3.7 4.2 4.0 3.0 .02 .004
 Postneonatal death, per 1,000 3.7 1.9 1.6 1.6 .05 .06
 Infant death, per 1,000 7.4 6.0 5.6 4.6 .007 .0006
*

P <.05.

Urban influence was determined according to work force commuting flows between rural areas and urban centers.

Two-sided P values in chi-square tests for differences and Cochran-Armitage tests for trends across the 4 strata: rural no urban influence, rural weak urban influence, rural moderate/strong urban influence, and urban areas.