. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 8.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):12–22. doi: 10.1037/a0019251

Table 1.

Response Time and Accuracy to the Primes in Experiments 1 and 2A

	Experiment 1				Experiment 2A
	RT (ms)		Accuracy (% correct)		RT (ms)		Accuracy (% correct)
Condition	Global	Local	Global	Local	Global	Local	Global	Local
LSF	671	746	85	94	764	849	86	94
HSF	694	746	84	95	767	848	84	96

Note. RT = response time; LSF = low spatial frequency; HSF = high spatial frequency. In Experiment 2, the marginal Prime Level × SF interaction (p = .051) found for the prime accuracies showed the same pattern as the prime RTs. Importantly, this is the same pattern as the Prime Level × SF interaction found for the probe RTs. Although the Prime Level × SF interaction was not statistically significant for prime RTs or for prime accuracy in Experiment 1, inspection of the means showed a similar pattern.