Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Psychiatry. 2009 Jun 2;14(8):755–763. doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.43

Table 1.

Most strongly associated SNPs using different methods to control for admixture and replication p-values.

Analysis SNP/Allele Location MAF Multidimensional Scaling LAMP-Adjusted Genomic Control
OR p-value OR p-value OR p-value
AA only rs2111504/Ta DPY19L3 (19q13.11) 0.23 1.74 1.5 × 10-6 1.73 1.7 × 10-6 1.66 5.0 × 10-6
rs2769605/Tb NTRK2 (9q21.33) 0.22 0.60 4.5 × 10-5 0.61 4.5 × 10-5 0.63 1.5 × 10-4
EA only rs1825828/Ca,c 3q11.2 0.26 0.70 7.0 × 10-7 0.70 7.6 × 10-7 0.68 2.9 × 10-7
rs5907577/Ta Xq27.1 0.31 1.48 1.6 × 10-6 1.47 2.1 × 10-6 1.444 4.6 × 10-6
rs10193871/Gb NAP5 (2q21.2) 0.13 0.65 9.8 × 10-6 0.65 7.1 × 10-6 0.65 8.8 × 10-6
EA/AA combined (main effect) rs4825220/Ca Xq27.1 0.37 0.71 2.6 × 10-7 0.70 1.9 × 10-7 0.61 0.8496d
EA Pritzker Non-Overlap rs6046396/Ga RIN2 (20p11.23) 0.29 1.54 1.43 × 10-6 1.56 6.2 × 10-7 1.57 4.93 × 10-7
a

Overall top hit

b

Top hit in region with at least 5 SNPs at P < 1× 10-4

c

Possibly of poor genotype quality (see text and Figure S2)

d

This p-value likely reflects the imbalance in the ratio of cases and controls in the EA relative to the AA sample.