Table 3.
(ch) | (LJ) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Window (ps) | Open | Closed | δ (Å2) | Open | Closed | Open | Closed | ΔFwater |
20 | –54.4 | –117.2 | 0.5 | ∞ | ∞ | ∞ | ∞ | – |
2.0 | 45.2 | 32.6 | –9.2 | –84.6 | 75.4 | |||
3.0 | 41.6 | 30.1 | –12.8 | –87.1 | 74.3 | |||
40 | −53.4 | −116.2 | 2.0 | 46.5 | 34.9 | −6.9 | −81.3 | 74.4 |
Errors | ±1.0 | ±0.8 | ±0.6 | ±0.4 | ±1.0 | ±0.9 | ±1.3 |
(ch) and (LJ) were obtained by eliminating the loop-water electrostatic (charge) and Lennard Jones (LJ) interactions, respectively; is their sum [Eq. 17]. Each integration is based on 22 windows, where the (best) results for windows of 40 ps are bold-faced. δ defines the soft-core LJ potentials [Eq. 21]. ΔFwater [Eq. 18] is the difference in the water free energy between the open and closed configurations. “Errors” stand for statistical errors [(standard deviation)∕401∕2].