TABLE 2.
Results of Generalized Estimating Equation Analyses of Psychosocial Measures, Sexual Partners, and Unprotected Sexual Acts: Men Residing in Atlanta, GA, 2009
| Intervention Group, Mean (SE) | Control Group, Mean (SE) | Wald χ2 | P | |
| Condom use self-efficacy | 5.12 | <.05 | ||
| 1 mo | 5.49 (0.08) | 5.28 (0.12) | ||
| 3 mo | 5.62 (0.08) | 5.25a (0.11) | ||
| Risk perceptions | 3.56 | .07 | ||
| 1 mo | 9.15 (0.17) | 8.57a (0.21) | ||
| 3 mo | 9.18 (0.22) | 8.89 (0.23) | ||
| Total no. of male sexual partners | 8.79 | <.01 | ||
| 1 mo | 1.42 (0.18) | 2.67a (0.47) | ||
| 3 mo | 1.31 (0.20) | 2.44a (0.47) | ||
| No. of HIV-negative partners | 2.28 | .13 | ||
| 1 mo | 0.91 (0.16) | 1.44b (0.28) | ||
| 3 mo | 0.81 (0.17) | 0.99 (0.16) | ||
| No. of HIV-positive/unknown status partners | 6.93 | <.01 | ||
| 1 mo | 0.47 (0.12) | 1.22 (0.43) | ||
| 3 mo | 0.49 (0.15) | 1.47b (0.47) | ||
| No. of unprotected anal sex acts with HIV-negative partners | 0.50 | .48 | ||
| 1 mo | 2.12 (0.67) | 1.08 (0.35) | ||
| 3 mo | 1.03 (0.39) | 1.14 (0.47) | ||
| No. of unprotected anal sex acts with HIV-positive/unknown status partners | 2.61 | .11 | ||
| 1 mo | 0.26 (0.10) | 0.79a (0.20) | ||
| 3 mo | 0.30 (0.14) | 0.44 (0.15) |
Note. Adjusted means are presented.
a
Pairwise contrast revealed significant (P < .05) difference at time point.
b
Pairwise contrast revealed marginally significant (P = .07) difference at time point.