Table 2.
Published potato QTL mapping studies included in the QTL meta-analysis
| Reference | Cross | Pop. sizea | No. of maps consideredb | Resistance assayc | Maturity traitd | QTL detection methode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [39] Bormann et al., 2004 | -S. tuberosum Leyla x S. tuberosum Escort | 84 | 1 c | FF | MT | LR |
| -S. tuberosum Leyla x S. tuberosum Nikita | 95 | |||||
| [55] Bradshaw et al., 2004 | -S. tuberosum 12601ab1 x S. tuberosum Stirling | 200-226 | / | FF, FG, T% | MT, PH | LR |
| [68] Bradshaw et al., 2006 | -HB193 = HB171 (S. tuberosum PDH247 x S. phureja DB226) x S. phureja DB226 | 87-120 | / | FF, FG, T% | / | IM |
| [42] Collins et al., 1999 | -GDE = G87D2.4.1[(DH Flora x PI 458.388) x (DH Dani x PI 230468)] x I88.55.6 {[DH (Belle de Fontenay x Kathadin) x PI 238141]x [DH Jose x (PI 195304 x WRF 380)]} † | 113 | 2 | FF, TS | MT, PV | LR |
| [35] Costanzo et al., 2005 | -BD410 = BD142-1 (S. phureja x S. stenotomum) x BD172-1 (S. phureja x S. stenotomum) | 132 | 1 c | FF | / | IM |
| [38] Danan et al., 2009 | -96D31 = S. tuberosum CasparH3 x S. sparsipilum PI 310984 | 93 | 4 | FF, ST | / | CIM |
| -96D32 = S. tuberosum RosaH1 x S. spegazzinii PI 208876 | 116 | |||||
| [54] Ewing et al., 2000 | -BCT = M200-30 (S. tuberosum USW2230 x S. berthaultii PI 473331) x S. tuberosum HH1-9 | 146 | 1 c | FF | / | LR |
| [69] Ghislain et al., 2001 | -PD = S. phureja CHS-625 x S. tuberosum PS-3 | 92 | 2 | FF | / | IM |
| [41] Leonards-Schippers et al., 1994 | -P49xP40 = H82.368/3 (P49) x H80.696/4 (P40) †† | 197 | 2 | LT | / | LR |
| [70] Meyer et al., 1998 | -S. tuberosum 12601ab1 x S. tuberosum Stirling | 94 | / | FF | / | LR |
| [71] Naess et al., 2000 | -1K6 = J101K6 (S. bulbocastanum x S. tuberosum)] x S. tuberosum Atlantic | 64 | 1 c | FG | / | LR |
| [64] Oberhagemann et al., 1999 | -K31 = H80.577/1 x H80.576/16 ††† | 113 | 1 c (K31) | LT | MT, PV | LR |
| -GDE = G87D2.4.1 [(DH Flora x PI 458.388) x (DH Dani x PI 230468)] x I88.55.6 {[DH (Belle de Fontenay x Kathadin) x PI 238141]x [DH Jose x (PI 195304 x WRF 380)]} † | 109 | |||||
| [72] Sandbrink et al., 2000 | -89-13 = S. microdontum MCD167 x S. tuberosum SH 82-44-111 | 67 | 1 (MCD167) | FF | / | IM |
| -89-14 = S. microdontum MCD167 x S. tuberosum SH 77-114-2988 | 46 | |||||
| -89-15 = S. microdontum MCD167 x S. tuberosum SH 82-59-223 | 47 | |||||
| -89-16 = S. microdontum MCD178 x S. tuberosum SH 82-44-111 | 82 | |||||
| -89-17 = S. microdontum MCD178 x S. tuberosum SH 77-114-2988 | 67 | |||||
| -89-18 = S. microdontum MCD178 x S. tuberosum SH 82-59-223 | 58 | |||||
| [40] Simko et al., 2006 | - BD410 = BD142-1 (S. phureja x S. stenotomum) x BD172-1 (S. phureja x S. stenotomum) | 125 | 1 c | WT | MT | MQM |
| [57] Sliwka et al., 2007 | -98-21 = DG 83-1520 (P1) x DG 84-195 (P2) †††† | 156 | 2 | LT, TS | MT | LR |
| [73] Sorensen et al., 2006 | -HGG = S. tuberosum 89-0-08-21 x S. vernei 3504 | 70 | 1 c (HGG) | FF | / | MQM |
| -HGIHJS = S. tuberosum 90-HAE-42 x S. vernei 3504 | 107 | |||||
| [36] Villamon et al., 2005 | -PCC1 = MP1-8 (S. paucissectum PI 473489-1 x S. chromatophilum PI 310991-1) x S. chromatophilum PI 310991-1 | 184 | 1 c | FF, FG | / | CIM |
| [56] Visker et al., 2003 | -CxE = USW5337.3 (S. phureja x S. tuberosum) x USW5337.3 (S. vernei × S. tuberosum) | 67 | / | FF | MT | MQM |
| [58] Visker et al., 2005 | -Progeny 5 SHxCE = S. tuberosum SH82-44-111 x CE51 (S. phureja x (S. vernei x S. tuberosum)) | 227 | / | FF | MT | IM |
| -Progeny 2 DHxI =S. tuberosum DH84-19-1659 x I88.55.6 ((S. tuberosum x S. stenotomum) x S. tuberosum x S. stenotomum) | 201 | |||||
a Population size for mapping; numbers could vary according to the phenotypic assessments for late blight resistance and maturity traits.
b A single number indicates the number of parental maps included in meta-analysis, otherwise the parental map which has been included is given; c: consensus map;/: no map was included because of a lack of common markers.
c Resistance assay: FF: foliage test in field, FG: foliage test in glasshouse, T%: tuber test in percentage of the number of infected tubers, WT: whole tuber test by scoring the tuber damage, TS: tuber slice test, LT: leaf test, ST: stem test.
d Maturity trait: MT: maturity type (assessment based on visual classification of senescence of the foliage), PH: plant height, PV: plant vigour.
eLR: linear regression, IM: simple interval mapping, CIM: composite interval mapping, MQM: multiple QTL mapping.
† G87D2.4.1 pedigree includes S. kurtzianum, S. vernei, S. tuberosum, and S. tarijense; I88.55.6 pedigree includes S. tuberosum and S. stenotomum [64].
†† P40 pedigree includes S. tuberosum and S. spegazzinii [41]
††† Unknown pedigree [64].
†††† Parental clone pedigrees of 98-21 population include S. tuberosum, S. chacoense, S. verrucosum, S. microdontum, S. gourlayi, S. yougasense [57].