Table 3.

Cross-table of true positive cases classified simultaneously by categories of pattern-dataset similarity and pattern differentiation outcome grouped by incremental combination of the Four Examinations

	Pattern-dataset similarity, S*						Total
Outcomes per Examination	No similarity	Negligible	Weak	Moderate	Strong	Perfect
Ip							7300
Correct diagnosis	100	100	562	943	586	1439	3730
Misdiagnosis	0	0	18	132	109	801	1060
Undiagnosis	0	0	20	225	105	2060	2410
Missing	-	-	-	-		-	100
Ip+AO							7300
Correct diagnosis	100	200	369	1283	760	1668	4380
Misdiagnosis	0	0	15	164	761	712	1652
Undiagnosis	0	0	16	153	79	1520	1768
Missing	-	-	-	-		-	100
Ip+AO+Iq							7300
Correct diagnosis	0	100	1048	3638	1462	437	6685
Misdiagnosis	0	0	51	200	107	125	483
Undiagnosis	0	0	1	62	31	38	132
Missing	-	-	-	-		-	0
Ip+AO+Iq+p							7300
Correct diagnosis	0	0	671	3839	1840	404	6754
Misdiagnosis	0	0	22	205	133	81	441
Undiagnosis	0	0	7	56	27	15	105
Missing	-	-	-	-		-	0

For Ip: γ = 0.684, 95% CI = [0.660, 0.708], P < 0.01; γ*² ≈ 27%

For Ip+AO: γ = 0.660, 95% CI = [0.634, 0.686], P < 0.01; γ*² ≈ 25%

For Ip+AO+Iq: γ = 0.398, 95% CI = [0.339, 0.458], P < 0.01; γ*² ≈ 8%

For Ip+AO+Iq+p: γ = 0.286, 95% CI = [0.217; 0.355], P < 0.01; γ*² ≈ 4%

Ip = Inspection; AO = Auscultation and Olfaction; Iq = Inquiry; P = Palpation.

Note: Missing cases were due to the absence of the manifestations describing the inspection method. These values were not considered for statistical analysis.