Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 14.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;116(2 Pt 1):284–292. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e8fb60

Table 5.

Adjusted Odds of at Least 70% Reduction in Number of Incontinent Episodes per Week Reported in Voiding Diary by Type of Incontinence and Magnitude of Weight Loss Compared With Weight Gain (Reference Group)*

0% to Less Than 5% Weight Loss
5% to Less Than 10% Weight Loss
More Than 10% Weight Loss
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P P
Total UI (mo)
 6 1.7 (0.7–4.6) 0.26 3.7 (1.6–8.2) <.001 3.8 (1.5–9.6) <.001 <.001
 12 1.6 (0.8–3.3) 0.19 3.7 (1.7–8.3) <.001 4.1 (2.1–7.9) <.001 <.001
 18 1.9 (1.1–3.3) 0.02 2.4 (1.1–5.1) .02 3.3 (1.7–6.4) <.001 <.001
Stress UI (mo)
 6 0.9 (0.4–2.0) 0.76 1.8 (0.9–3.7) .11 1.6 (0.6–3.9) .33 .13
 12 1.7 (0.9–3.4) 0.12 2.4 (1.1–5.3) .02 3.4 (1.4–8.1) .01 .001
 18 1.8 (0.9–3.4) 0.09 1.7 (0.8–3.4) .17 2.3 (1.0–5.1) .04 .05
Urge UI (mo)
 6 2.2 (0.8–6.6) 0.15 4.1 (1.5–10.7) <.001 4.5 (1.4–14.1) .01 <.001
 12 1.6 (0.8–3.2) 0.19 2.4 (1.2–5.0) .02 3.2 (1.6–6.2) <.001 <.001
 18 2.3 (1.5–3.6) <0.001 2.9 (1.5–5.5) <.001 4.0 (2.1–7.9) <.001 <.001

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; UI, urinary incontinence.

*

Adjusted for treatment group, use of incontinence behavioral treatment booklet, clinic, age, alcohol use, smoking status, race, number of live births, and amount of calories burned.

Test for trend from orthogonal contrasts in statistical model.