Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 May;57(5):790–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02188.x

Table 3.

Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Results from Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Item Response Theory (IRT) Methods

Chi-Square (Difference)
Whites Versus Mexican Mexican Americans Whites Versus Blacks Americans Versus Blacks
***
Model CFA* (Δ df 5 2) IRT (D df 5 4) CFA* (Δ df 5 2) IRT (Δ df 5 4) CFA* (Δ df 5 2) IRT (Δ df 5 4)
Baseline model (referent: Item 1) 2,033.9 27,259.1 6,344.6 58,833.0 5,495.8 44,396.8
Comparison models
2. Appetite 10.8 15.6 0.9 80.3DIF 9.87 33.3DIF
3. Blues 8.4 13.4 18.2DIF 18.4DIF 19.51DIF 25.8DIF
4. Good 8.8 3.5 893.0DIF 346.2DIF 307.16DIF 124.0DIF
5. Mind 5.3 7.8 12.9DIF 81.4DIF 14.62DIF 30.8DIF
6. Depressed 6.8 7.2 17.6DIF 39.7DIF 13.57DIF 29.6DIF
7. Effort 5.7 17.2DIF 52.9DIF 60.1DIF 4.52 52.8DIF
8. Hopeful 10.8 17.8DIF 41.3DIF 212.2DIF 1.68 72.4DIF
9. Failure 4.9 5.0 32.6DIF 33.2DIF 7.8 6.7
10. Fearful 4.5 7.2 31.3DIF 52.8DIF 0.8 15.3
11. Sleep 9.6 10.1 6.0 80.8DIF 2.0 37.3DIF
12. Happy 14.8DIF 5.8 214.4DIF 225.4DIF 177.4DIF 53.9DIF
13. Talked less 0.4 4.3 12.7DIF 80.1DIF 2.1 25.4DIF
14. Lonely 1.2 6.2 7.0 29.9DIF 1.8 18.2DIF
15. Unfriendly 29.4DIF 41.5DIF 34.5DIF 24.3DIF 15.7DIF 43.0DIF
16. Enjoyed 33.7DIF 10.7 619.8DIF 341.2DIF 267.8DIF 97.3DIF
17. Crying 21.9DIF 5.0 383.2 DIF 105.7DIF 294.0DIF 49.1DIF
18. Sad 0.2 11.6 77.9DIF 50.6DIF 20.9DIF 38.2DIF
19. Disliked 47.7DIF 48.5DIF 146.1DIF 72.6DIF 10.8 38.5DIF
20. Get going 1.4 7.4 17.2DIF 74.3DIF 6.3 29.4DIF
Total number of DIF items 5 4 16 19 9 17

Note: Items in bold are common DIF items across CFA and IRT methods in each cross-racial or -ethnic comparison.

*

In CFA, DIF flagged if chi-square (χ2) was >11.88.

In IRT, DIF flagged if χ2 was >16.31.

Reverse-coded item.