Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 14;6(2):e16976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016976

Table 3. Assessment of risk of bias in studies.

Study Site Adequate sequence generation Allocation assignment Blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors No evidence of incomplete outcome data No evidence of selective outcome reporting
Cisse (2006) [20] Niakhar Yes Yes Yes (double blind) Yes Yes
Kweku (2008) [22] Hohoe Yes Yes No (drug packers and principal investigator un-blinded) Yes Yes
Dicko (2008) [21] Kambila Yes Yes No (open label, control arm received no intervention) Yes Yes
Bojang (2010) [19] Basse No (control arm for malaria incidence/safety comparison non randomised) Yes No (open label) No (higher loss to follow up in SP+AQ arm, 22% vs 11–12%, no obvious explanation) Yes
Dicko (2011) [12] Kati Region Yes Yes Yes (double blind) Yes Yes
Konaté (2011) [13] Boussé Yes Yes Yes (double blind) Yes Yes
Sesay (2011) [23] Farafenni Not assessed (information not available)
Sokhna (2008) [24] Niakhar No (villages chosen for logistical convenience, systematic allocation of individual children) No (open label) Yes Yes
Cisse (2009) [25] Ndoffane Yes Yes No (open label) Yes Yes
Bojang (2011) [26] Basse Yes Yes No (open label) Yes Yes
Kweku (2009) [27] Jasikan Yes Yes No (open label) Yes Yes
Cisse [28] (unpublished) Tivaouane Not assessed (information not available)

AQ: amodiaquine, SP: sulphadoxine pyrimethamine.