Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Dec 8;69(5):407–414. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.050

Table 2.

Pairwise group comparisons of bilateral Wernicke’s FC with subregions of the left IFG

Comparison F value (df =1,76) P-value Direction of difference1
Controls vs. Hallucinators averaged over left IFG 2.31 .13 *
Controls vs. Nonhallucinators averaged over left IFG 10.0 .002 HC > NH
Hallucinators vs. Nonhallucinators averaged over left IFG 3.55 .06 HAL > NH
Controls vs. Hallucinators in BA44 of left IFG 0.15 .69 *
Controls vs. Nonhallucinators in BA44 of left IFG 0.35 .55 *
Hallucinators vs Nonhallucinators in BA44 of left IFG 0.06 0.81 *
Controls vs. Hallucinators in BA45 of left IFG 0.44 0.51 *
Control vs. Nonhallucinators in BA45 of left IFG 7.02 0.01 HC > NH
Hallucinators vs. Nonhallucinators in BA45 of left IFG 4.82 0.03 HAL > NH
Controls vs. Hallucinators in BA46 of left IFG 0 0.98 *
Controls vs. Nonhallucinators in BA46 of left IFG 9.68 0.003 HC > NH
Hallucinators vs. Nonhallucinators in BA46 of left IFG 11.1 0.001 HAL > NH
Control vs. Hallucinators in BA47 of left IFG 7.13 0.009 HC > HAL
Control vs. Nonhallucinators in BA47 of left IFG 4.18 0.04 HC > NH
Hallucinators vs. Nonhallucinators in BA47 of left IFG .24 .63 *
1

HC=Healthy controls, HAL = hallucinating patients, NH=nonhallucinating patients