Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr;63(4):892–901. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22289

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

a: Fat signal fraction in the presence of T2 effects with T2w=T2f=30ms. The effects lead to 2% of bias at the true fat fraction = 0. b: Simulated fat fraction after T2 correction (i.e., Eq. 5) with T2w=30ms, and T2f varies from 10 ms to 60 ms. The correction was performed using 30 ms to correct for both the water and fat signals. Assuming the true fat fraction is 1% (point as the dotted lines crossed, where T2 corrected fat fraction is also 1%), the deviation from true value is less than 0.04% in the worst case.