Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 24;12(1):24–38. doi: 10.3390/ijms12010024

Table 1.

Potential biomarkers in spinal muscular atrophy.

Potential Biomarker Pros Cons
Instrumental
CMAP and MUNE
• Both measures are related to phenotypic severity • MUNE does not appear related to motor function in a group of type II patients
• Progressively decrease over time (MUNE is more stable in type III) • There is no evidence yet of correlations between motor function and CMAP variations
• Are related to SMN2 copy number
• Have been evaluated in an open phase II trial of valproic acid
• CMAP, but not MUNE, increases with VPA
DXA
• Bone density increased after VPA treatment • The biological significance of BMD reduction in SMA patients is not established
• It is not known whether BMD variations are related to the clinical outcome of treatment
Molecular
SMN protein quantification
• SMN protein levels, as determined by cell immunoassay, are related to SMN2 copy number • SMN protein levels are not related to clinical severity
• For cell immunoassay, small amount of PBMC are sufficient for SMN quantification • No stabilization buffers are commercially available for total proteins
• ELISA assay is sensitive down to magnitude of pg/mL of SMN protein • PBMC should be manipulated within 2 hours from sampling
• The minimum amount of peripheral blood necessary for SMN quantification is not known
• It is not indicated for evaluation of candidate compounds which do not modify SMN levels
SMN transcript quantification
• Small amounts of blood (2.5 mL or less) are sufficient for mRNA quantification • It is not known if protein and transcript levels are related
• Several stabilization buffers are available for multicenter clinical trials • It is unknown if transcript level variations are related to the clinical outcome of treatment
• SMN transcripts are stable over time • It is unknown if transcript levels in blood and target tissues are related
• It is not indicated for the evaluation of candidate compounds which do not modify SMN levels