Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Oncol. 2010 Oct;49(7):991–996. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.500302

Table 1. Dose conformity for permutations of plan parameters.

Plans were generated from permutations of physical objectives for each prescription sub-volume modifying various plan parameters. Bolded values represent default plan parameters. Pitches equivalent to 0.860 divided by an integer were used in this study to minimize the thread effect [17].

Parameter Definition Value Q0.95–1.05 (% PTV)
Prescription Levels Number of dose levels into
which voxel-based
prescription was discretized
3 69
5 87
7 92
9 93
11 93
Physical Delivery Jaw Longitudinal slice thickness
projected at the machine
isocenter
5.00 cm 81
2.50 cm 87
1.05 cm 93
Pitch Ratio of couch travel distance
per rotation to the primary jaw
width
0.860 91
0.430 93
0.287 93
0.215 93
0.172 93
Modulation Factor Ratio of the maximum leaf
opening time to the average
leaf opening time for all non-
zero leaves
1 36
1.5 90
2 92
3 93
6 93
Optimization DVH Volume
Objective
Percentage of target
substructure receiving
prescribed dose or higher
25 % 91
75 % 89
VMean Dose 93
Normalization
Point
Scaling factor to normalize
dose to primary target
objective
Lowest Level 90
Mean Dose 93
Highest Level 92