Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb;39(1):29–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00561.x

Table 1.

Community characteristics in intervention and control groups at the time of enrollment

Control group Intervention group P-valuea
Distribution among 30 communities
Number of communities 15 15
Population size: number (%)
 ≤450 people 9/15 (60%) 9/15 (60%) 1.00
 >450 people 6/15 (40%) 6/15 (40%)
Distance to nearest hospital: number (%)
 <250km 2/15 (13%) 4/15 (27%) 0.65
 ≥250 km 13/15 (87%) 11/15 (73%)
Fluoride concentration in drinking water: number (%)
 <0.6 ppm F 10/15 (67%) 12/15 (80%) 0.68
 ≥0.6 ppm F 5/15 (33%) 3/15 (20%)
Distribution among 666 children
Number of children 322 344
Population size: number (%)
 ≤450 people 155/322 (48%) 104/344 (30%) <0.01
 >450 people 167/322 (52%) 240/344 (70%)
Distance to nearest hospital: number (%)
 <250 km 28/322 (9%) 46/344 (13%) 0.06
 ≥250 km 294/322 (91%) 298/344 (87%)
Fluoride concentration in drinking water: number (%)
 <0.6 ppm F 262/322 (81%) 315/344 (92%) <0.01
 ≥0.6 ppm F 60/322 (19%) 29/344 (8%)
a

P-values test null hypothesis of equivalence between control and intervention using Fisher's exact test.