Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;4(1):79–93. doi: 10.1007/s11869-010-0101-8

Table 2.

Animal studies evaluating the effect of particulate air pollution on atherosclerosis

Study PM fraction (mode of administration) Animal model Diet Assessment of atherosclerosis (method) Effect of PM on atherosclerosis Ref
Suwa et al. 2002 PM10 (IT) Watanabe rabbits Chow Percent lesional volume in coronary arteries and aorta (histology) Increase (Suwa et al. 2002)
Chen and Nadziejko 2005 PM2.5 (inhaled CAPs) apoE−/−, LDL−/− mice and apoE−/− mice Chow Percent lesional area in whole aorta (histology) No change (apoE−/−, LDL−/− mice) increase (apoE−/− mice) (Chen and Nadziejko 2005)
Sun et al. 2005 PM2.5 (inhaled CAPs) apoE−/− mice Chow or CED Percent lesional area in cross-sections of aorta (histology) N.S. increase (chow-fed mice). Increase (CED-fed mice) (Sun et al. 2005)
Niwa et al. 2007 Carbon black (IT) LDL-R−/− mice CED Percent lesional area in whole aorta (histology) Increase (Niwa et al. 2007)
Sun et al. 2008 PM2.5 (Inhaled CAPs) apoE−/− mice Chow or CED Percent lesional area in aorta (ultrasound) N.S. increase (chow-fed mice). Increase (CED-fed mice) (Sun et al. 2008)
Yatera et al. 2008 PM10 (IT) Watanabe rabbits Chow Percent lesional volume and% lesional area in the aorta (histology) Increase (Yatera et al. 2008)
Araujo et al. 2008 PM2.5 and UFP (Inhaled CAPs) apoE−/− mice Chow Mean lesional area in aortic root (histology) N.S. increase (PM2.5-exposed mice) Increase (UFP-exposed mice) (Araujo et al. 2008)
Castro-Soares et al. 2009 PM (inhaled polluted air) LDLR−/− mice CED Percent lesional area in aortic root. Aortic wall thickness (histology) No change in lesional area.Increase in wall thickness (Soares et al. 2009)
Ying et al. 2009a PM2.5 (inhaled CAPs) apoE−/− mice CED Percent lesional area in cross-sections of aorta (histology) Increase (Ying et al. 2009a)
Campen et al. 2010 PM + gasses (Inhaled DE) apoE−/− mice CED Percent lesional area in the aortic root plaque composition N.S. increase. Increase in macrophage content (Campen et al. 2010)
Chen et al. 2010 PM2.5 (inhaled CAPs) apoE−/− mice Chow Percent lesional area in brachiocephalic and left common arteries (ultrasound) Increase (Chen et al. 2010)
Quan et al. 2010 PM±/− gasses (Inhaled CAPs vs. Inhaled whole DE or DE gasses) apoE−/− mice Chow Percent lesional area in brachiocephalic artery (ultrasound) Increase (CAPs ≥ whole DE ≥ DE gasses = filtered air) (Quan et al. 2010)

Studies are shown in chronological order based on the year of publication. IT intratraqueal, CAPs concentrated ambient particles, DE diesel emissions, CED cholesterol-enriched diet, NS not significant. Modified from Araujo (2011)