Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2010 Oct 7;114(39):12501–12507. doi: 10.1021/jp105549s

Table 4.

Reorientational correlation times τ and NMR 1/T1 of α,α–trehalose and β-maltose solutions.

Sim
Expa
compound carbon τ (ps) 1/T1 (s−1) 1/T1 (s−1) Err (%)
1 32.1 2.10 2.07 1.4
2 33.3 2.18 2.09 4.4
trehalose 3 33.2 2.17 2.04 6.3
4 33.1 2.16 2.02 7.0
5 33.4 2.18 2.00 8.8
6 29.3 3.83 3.40 12.5
1 28.6 1.87 1.92 −2.7
2 31.0 2.03 1.96 3.3
maltose 3 30.7 2.01 1.92 4.4
4 30.9 2.02 1.92 5.0
5 30.9 2.02 1.96 3.0
6 25.0 3.27 3.13 4.6
1’ 26.5 1.73 1.52 14.2
2’ 27.0 1.77 1.59 11.3
3’ 27.2 1.78 1.61 10.4
4’ 27.8 1.81 1.72 5.2
5’ 26.9 1.76 1.61 9.2
6’ 28.1 3.67 3.45 6.4
a)

25 °C, 4 wt% in D2O; ref 22

b)

From τ scaled by data in Table 1 (1.23 × ηexpsim) for D2O. Statistical errors in the simulated relaxation times are approximately 2%.