Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 28;119(2):252–257. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002238

Table 3.

Adjusteda linear regression coefficients for change in semen quality or sperm measures associated with a ln-unit increase in urinary concentrations of MP or PP (n = 190).

MP
PP
Semen/sperm measure β-Coefficient (95% CI) p-Value β-Coefficient (95% CI) p-Value
Semen quality

 Total count (106)b −0.07 (−0.25 to 0.11) 0.42 −0.05 (−0.17 to 0.08) 0.45
 Concentration (106/mL)b −0.08 (−0.24 to 0.08) 0.33 −0.06 (−0.17 to 0.05) 0.27
 Motility (% motile) −0.48 (−3.26 to 2.30) 0.73 −0.20 (−2.09 to 1.69) 0.84
 Morphology (% normal) 0.04 (−0.52 to 0.60) 0.89 0.14 (−0.24 to 0.52) 0.46

Sperm motion

 VSL (μm/sec) 0.001 (−1.72 to 1.73) 1.00 −0.05 (−1.22 to 1.12) 0.93
 VCL (μm/sec) −0.17 (−3.09 to 2.75) 0.91 −0.18 (−2.17 to 1.80) 0.86
 Linearity (%) −0.25 (−2.00 to 1.50) 0.78 0.002 (−1.19 to 1.19) 1.00

DNA damagec

 Comet extent (μm) 0.67 (−6.10 to 7.45) 0.84 −1.19 (−5.61 to 3.22) 0.59
 TDM (μm) −1.31 (−3.58 to 0.95) 0.25 −1.42 (−2.88 to 0.04) 0.06
 Tail% 2.35 (−0.16 to 4.85) 0.07 0.67 (−0.98 to 2.32) 0.42

CI, confidence interval.

a

Adjusted for SG, age, BMI, abstinence period, current smoking, and time of day of urine/semen sample collection.

b

Model included ln-transformations of parabens, sperm count, and sperm concentration.

c

n = 132.