Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 8;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-28

Table 1.

Response of Anopheles gambiae in an olfactometer to compounds identified in bacterial headspace samples.

Compound Dilution N Treatment Control χ2-test (P-value) Effect
1-butanol 1:100 167 34 39 0.56
1:1,000 160 23 38 0.05
1:10,000 163 32 17 0.03 +
2,3-butanedione 1:100 166 25 42 0.04 -
1:1,000 166 25 39 0.08
1:10,000 169 44 28 0.06
2-methyl-1-butanol 1:100 165 22 25 0.66
1:1,000 164 24 45 0.01 -
1:10,000 168 38 22 0.04 +
2-methylbutanal 1:100 174 33 49 0.08
1:1,000 172 13 22 0.13
1:10,000 171 31 18 0.06
2-methylbutanoic acid 1:100 167 49 25 0.01 +
1:1,000 171 49 41 0.40
1:10,000 166 38 43 0.58
3-hydroxy-2-butanone 1:100 168 21 29 0.26
1:1,000 170 29 36 0.39
1:10,000 170 36 17 0.01 +
3-methyl-1-butanol 1:100 163 29 31 0.80
1:1,000 158 20 28 0.25
1:10,000 157 41 25 0.048 +
3-methylbutanal 1:100 170 34 18 0.03 +
1:1,000 168 24 21 0.65
1:10,000 172 16 16 1.00
3-methylbutanoic acid 1:100 163 22 25 0.66
1:1,000 161 33 24 0.23
1:10,000 161 30 18 0.08
2-phenylethanol 1:100 162 24 30 0.41
1:1,000 167 15 40 <0.001 -
1:10,000 155 11 25 0.02 -

The ten test compounds were applied in three dilutions (1:100; 1:1,000; and 1:10,000) in LDPE sachets. The effect of the compounds on mosquito behaviour was examined by adding them individually to the attractive basic blend (treatment) and to test this combination against the basic blend (control). N = number of mosquitoes released. The effect (E) of the compound tested on the 'attractiveness' of the basic blend is indicated: + = significant increase of mosquito catches compared to the control, - = significant reduction of mosquito catches compared to the control.