Table 1.
Compound | Dilution | N | Treatment | Control | χ2-test (P-value) | Effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-butanol | 1:100 | 167 | 34 | 39 | 0.56 | |
1:1,000 | 160 | 23 | 38 | 0.05 | ||
1:10,000 | 163 | 32 | 17 | 0.03 | + | |
2,3-butanedione | 1:100 | 166 | 25 | 42 | 0.04 | - |
1:1,000 | 166 | 25 | 39 | 0.08 | ||
1:10,000 | 169 | 44 | 28 | 0.06 | ||
2-methyl-1-butanol | 1:100 | 165 | 22 | 25 | 0.66 | |
1:1,000 | 164 | 24 | 45 | 0.01 | - | |
1:10,000 | 168 | 38 | 22 | 0.04 | + | |
2-methylbutanal | 1:100 | 174 | 33 | 49 | 0.08 | |
1:1,000 | 172 | 13 | 22 | 0.13 | ||
1:10,000 | 171 | 31 | 18 | 0.06 | ||
2-methylbutanoic acid | 1:100 | 167 | 49 | 25 | 0.01 | + |
1:1,000 | 171 | 49 | 41 | 0.40 | ||
1:10,000 | 166 | 38 | 43 | 0.58 | ||
3-hydroxy-2-butanone | 1:100 | 168 | 21 | 29 | 0.26 | |
1:1,000 | 170 | 29 | 36 | 0.39 | ||
1:10,000 | 170 | 36 | 17 | 0.01 | + | |
3-methyl-1-butanol | 1:100 | 163 | 29 | 31 | 0.80 | |
1:1,000 | 158 | 20 | 28 | 0.25 | ||
1:10,000 | 157 | 41 | 25 | 0.048 | + | |
3-methylbutanal | 1:100 | 170 | 34 | 18 | 0.03 | + |
1:1,000 | 168 | 24 | 21 | 0.65 | ||
1:10,000 | 172 | 16 | 16 | 1.00 | ||
3-methylbutanoic acid | 1:100 | 163 | 22 | 25 | 0.66 | |
1:1,000 | 161 | 33 | 24 | 0.23 | ||
1:10,000 | 161 | 30 | 18 | 0.08 | ||
2-phenylethanol | 1:100 | 162 | 24 | 30 | 0.41 | |
1:1,000 | 167 | 15 | 40 | <0.001 | - | |
1:10,000 | 155 | 11 | 25 | 0.02 | - |
The ten test compounds were applied in three dilutions (1:100; 1:1,000; and 1:10,000) in LDPE sachets. The effect of the compounds on mosquito behaviour was examined by adding them individually to the attractive basic blend (treatment) and to test this combination against the basic blend (control). N = number of mosquitoes released. The effect (E) of the compound tested on the 'attractiveness' of the basic blend is indicated: + = significant increase of mosquito catches compared to the control, - = significant reduction of mosquito catches compared to the control.