Table 1.
Study | No. of patients | Chemotherapeutic agents | Response | Duration oftherapy | Follow-up |
Weiss and Lackman 1989 [6] | 8 | vinblastine and methotrexate | 2 CR, 5 PR, ÌMR | NR | NR |
Okuno and Edmonson 2003 [7] | 7 | cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2; mitomycin 8 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2; ifosfamide 2,500 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 | Objective disease regression 3 patients, clinical benefit 6 patients | 3–12 months 2–8 cycles | 3 months-15 years |
Patel et al. 1993 [8] | 9 | doxorubicin 60–90 mg/m2 and dacarbazine 750–1,000 mg/m2 | 2 CR, 4 PR, 1 MR, 2 SD | 5 cycles | 28–253 months |
Gega et al. 2006 [9] | 7 | doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 daily and dacarbazine 150 mg/m2 followed by meloxicam 10 mg/m2 | 3 CR | 4 cycles | NR |
Azzarelli et al. 2001 [10] | 30 | methotrexate 30 mg/m2 and vinblastine 6 mg/m2 | 12 PR, 18 SD | 38 cycles | 6–96 months |
Tsukada et al. 1991 [11] | 8 | adriamycin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 and vincristine 2 mg/m2 and 5-FU 275 mg/m2; adriamycin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 and dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 or actinomycin D | 2 CR, 1 PR | NR | NR |
Weiss et al. 1999 [15] | 17 | methotrexate 50 mg parenterally once a week and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 weekly | 3 CR, 7 PR, 2 MR, 3 SD, 2 PD | NR | NR |
Response evaluation according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST): CR = complete response; PR = partial response; SD = stable disease; MR = minor response; PD = progressive disease; NR = not reported