Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Environ. 2010;32(2):109–136. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0119-8

Table 3.

Multilevel hazard model predicting monthly rate of out-migration separately for males and females in Nepal’s Chitwan Valley 1997–1999.

Independent variables Local Moves
Distant Moves
Males Females Males Females
Environmental controls
 Perceived productivity decline 1.30+ 1.34+ 1.19+ 1.12
 Share of neighborhood green 0.99 0.97** 1.01+ 1.00
 Time to gather firewood 1.16** 1.03 1.03 1.04+
 Time to collect fodder 1.08 1.21+ 1.04 1.14*
 Population density 0.98 0.96+ 1.01 0.98
Theoretical controls
Human capital
 Enrolled in school 0.60* 0.40** 0.85 0.57***
 Years of schooling 0.94** 1.06** 1.04*** 1.08***
 Currently has wage job 0.67* 0.75+ 1.02 0.93
 Currently has salaried job 1.82** 11.30*** 1.59** 1.47
Social capital
 Household network tie 1.12 1.00 1.36** 1.51***
 Neighborhood prevalence 3.01 2.82 6.69** 2.96+
Physical capital
 Access to markets 0.92 1.22+ 1.06 0.99
 Farmland 1.48 1.20 0.64* 0.67+
 Equipment 1.20* 1.16* 1.07+ 0.95
 Livestock 0.85** 0.93+ 0.95* 1.01
 House plot owned 0.37** 0.46* 0.70+ 1.53
 Home quality 0.87*** 0.97 0.99 1.05*
Demographic controls
Age (Birth cohort)
 15–24 (1972–1981) 9.60*** 4.43*** 4.22*** 1.80**
 25–34 (1962–1971) 5.82*** 3.26*** 2.10*** 0.80
 25–44 (1952–1961) 1.87* 2.68** 0.88 0.66*
 45–59 (1936–1951)
Ethnicity
 High Caste Hindu
 Low Caste Hindu 0.50* 1.88* 1.23 1.09
 Hill Tibeto-Burmese 0.57* 1.14 1.25+ 1.21
 Newar 0.51 2.28* 0.82 0.97
 Terai Tibeto-Burmese 0.67+ 2.38** 0.83 0.83
Duration
 Month 0.94* 0.91** 0.96** 1.00
 Month squared 1.00+ 1.01* 1.01+ 1.00
ICC 0.69 0.65 0.17 0.12
Deviance 1,166 1,180 3,798 3,721
Person Months 29,434 38,875 29,562 39,771

Source: Same as Table 1

+

P<.10

*

P<.05,

**

P<.01,

***

P<.001 all probabilities are one-tailed.