Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 2;218(2):202–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01318.x

Table 1.

Mean values of finger lengths measured by the direct and indirect methods in males and females.

Variable Males (n = 276) (mean ± SD) Females (n = 284) (mean ± SD) Effect of size Sex difference (P-value) df
Right 2DL
Direct (cm) 6.92 ± 0.46 6.26 ± 0.41 1.52 0.665 (0.000)* 558
Indirect (μm) 5.65 ± 0.34 5.18 ± 0.32 1.42 0.467 0.000* 558
Method difference (P-value) 1.274 (0.000)* 1.075 (0.000)*
Right 4DL
Direct (cm) 7.05 ± 0.48 6.39 ± 0.44 1.43 0.661 (0.000)* 558
Indirect (cm) 5.92 ± 0.38 5.30 ± 0.33 1.73 0.608 (0.000)* 558
Method difference (P-value) 1.133 (0.000)* 1.080 (0.000)*
Left 2DL
Direct (cm) 6.88 ± 0.46 6.30 ± 0.42 1.32 0.586 (0.000)* 558
Indirect (cm) 5.64 ± 0.35 5.13 ± 0.33 1.49 0.509 (0.000)* 558
Method difference (P-value) 1.248 (0.000)* 1.171 (0.000)*
Left 4DL
Direct (cm) 7.07 ± 0.48 6.36 ± 0.45 1.51 0.712 (0.000)* 558
Indirect (cm) 5.88 ± 0.37 5.28 ± 0.33 1.68 0.591 (0.000)* 558
Method difference (P-value) 1.202 (0.000)* 1.081 (0.000)*

2DL, 2nd finger length; 4DL, 4th ring length; df, degrees of freedom.

*

P-value ≤ 0.05.