Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 27;3:4. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-4

Table 3.

Overall effects of the choice of the force field and energy window upon the average RMSD and ST values between the computationally generated conformations and the experimental conformations for the 25,972 3-D reference structures

Torsion Search Force Fielda

Energy window (kcal/mol) Fragment Force Fielda Full NoEstat Trunc



RMSD ST RMSD ST RMSD ST
5 Full 0.69 0.89 0.48 0.93 0.47 0.93
NoEstat 0.69 0.89 0.48 0.93 0.47 0.93
Trunc 0.71 0.89 0.48 0.93 0.46 0.93
10 Full 0.52 0.92 0.42 0.94 0.42 0.94
NoEstat 0.52 0.92 0.42 0.94 0.42 0.94
Trunc 0.52 0.92 0.41 0.94 0.42 0.94
15 Full 0.46 0.93 0.40 0.94 0.40 0.95
NoEstat 0.46 0.93 0.40 0.94 0.40 0.95
Trunc 0.46 0.93 0.40 0.94 0.40 0.95

a Full = the 94s variant of the Merck molecular force field (MMFF94s); NoEstat = MMFF94s without coulombic interaction terms; Trunc = MMFF94s without coulombic and van der Waals interaction terms.