Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Public Health Nutr. 2009 Apr 30;12(11):2060–2067. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009005242

Table 3.

Weekly sales of promoted foods at baseline and post-intervention for intervention corner stores (n 7) v. comparison corner stores (n 6): Baltimore Healthy Stores (BHS) programme

Promoted food Unit sale difference*
P value
Intervention
Comparison
Mean SD Mean SD
Low-sugar cereals (box) 3·9 8·8 −1·9 1·4 0·13
High-fibre cereals (box) −0·8 2·1 −2·8 2·6 0·20
Low-fat milk (gallon) −0·4 1·3 −1·9 2·7 0·23
Cooking spray (can) 0·3 0·5 −0·5 0·6 0·05
Baked/low-fat chips (bag) 1·1 2·0 0 0 0·13
Low-salt crackers (bag) 0·3 0·8 −0·4 0·7 0·13
Whole wheat bread (loaf) 0·4 6·2 −1·9 8·3 0·71
Diet soda/diet drinks −10·0 39·2 10·5 29·5 0·58
100 % fruit juice (bottle) 4·9 39·4 −10·6 59·8 0·63
Water (bottle) −15·8 91·9 −2·2 56·5 0·83

Significance indicated at P<0·05.

*

Actual number of units sold was collected using the weekly food sales records and assessment of sales of promoted food was based on storeowners’ recall.