Table 2.
Items | Mean* | SD |
---|---|---|
Factor 2 –Minimal Reflection(Cronbach’s α = 0.58) | ||
When I do activities like in this case, I complete them without thinking about what I am doing | 3.66 | 1.12 |
If I follow what the case says, I do not have to think too much | 3.46 | 1.09 |
Factor 1 –High Reflection(Cronbach’s α = 0.85) | ||
This case required me to understand the concepts taught by the module | 3.73 | 1.13 |
I need to understand the material taught by the case in order to perform practical tasks | 3.47 | 0.97 |
This case caused me to reflect on my actions to see whether I could improve on what I do | 3.71 | 0.98 |
This case made me think over what I have been doing and consider alternative ways of doing it | 3.47 | 1.13 |
As a result of this case, I will change my normal way of doing things | 2.93 | 1.03 |
During this case, I discovered faults in what I had previously believed to be right | 2.89 | 1.18 |
Overall –All 8 items(Cronbach’s α = 0.77) | 3.41 | 0.64 |
*Items comprising Factor 2 were reverse score so that all item values were positive
SD = standard deviation; Cronbach’s α represents internal consistency reliability for the items comprising each factor and overall