Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 27;26(3):293–298. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1548-x

Table 2.

Faculty Physician Reflection on Adverse Patient Events: Factors, Mean Scores and Reliability

Items Mean* SD
Factor 2 –Minimal Reflection(Cronbach’s α = 0.58)
 When I do activities like in this case, I complete them without thinking about what I am doing 3.66 1.12
 If I follow what the case says, I do not have to think too much 3.46 1.09
Factor 1 –High Reflection(Cronbach’s α = 0.85)
 This case required me to understand the concepts taught by the module 3.73 1.13
 I need to understand the material taught by the case in order to perform practical tasks 3.47 0.97
 This case caused me to reflect on my actions to see whether I could improve on what I do 3.71 0.98
 This case made me think over what I have been doing and consider alternative ways of doing it 3.47 1.13
 As a result of this case, I will change my normal way of doing things 2.93 1.03
 During this case, I discovered faults in what I had previously believed to be right 2.89 1.18
 Overall –All 8 items(Cronbach’s α = 0.77) 3.41 0.64

*Items comprising Factor 2 were reverse score so that all item values were positive

SD = standard deviation; Cronbach’s α represents internal consistency reliability for the items comprising each factor and overall