Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;26(3):307–316. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1556-x

Table 2.

CCTA Diagnostic Accuracy Study Quality and Internal Validity, as Assessed by Modified QUADAS Tool

QUADAS item Response % (N = 42)
Yes No Unclear
Spectrum representative of disease risk 29 66 5
Clear selection criteria 73 19 8
Referent likely to classify CAD 90 0 10
Limited time between diagnostic and referent 81 2 17
Avoid partial verification bias 83 10 7
Avoid differential verification bias 94 4 2
Avoid incorporation bias 98 0 2
Avoid test review bias 71 2 27
Avoid diagnostic review bias 54 8 38
Avoid clinical review bias 67 29 4
Non-diagnostic results reported 65 33 2
Withdrawals explained 33 63 4
Established cut-off for significant stenosis 96 2 2
Observer variation reported 23 77 0
Data presented for appropriate subgroups 90 2 8
True CAD prevalence reported 79 21 0

“Response %” is based on the proportion of studies meeting criteria for each item

CCTA: Coronary computed tomographic angiography

QUADAS: Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

CAD: Coronary artery disease