Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;26(3):307–316. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1556-x

Table 4.

Studies Reporting CCTA Impact on Patient Management and/or Outcomes

Author Year Setting Sample Size Age (Mean, SD) % Male CAD Risk Follow-Up Diagnosis Method Major Findings
Danciu 2007 OP 421 64 (12) 63% Intermediate 12 months SPECT, ICA, MACE Event rate 0.3% in low risk group vs. 70.5% for ICA
Goldstein 2007 ED 99 48 (11) 43% Very low 6 months ICA, repeat testing (MACE) CCTA correctly and definitively diagnosed in 95%
Gallagher 2007 ED 85 49 (11) 53% Low 30 days ICA, record review, clinical follow-up No events recorded; CCTA+ in 6 of 7 w/confirmed ACS
Hoffmann 2006 ED 103 54 (12) 60% Low Mean: 5.2 months Record review (ACS) Sensitivity 100% for ACS, specificity 82%
Hollander 2007 ED 54 47 (9) 46% Low 30 days Survey, record review (CV death/MI) No events recorded; CAD confirmed in 4 of 6 CCTA (+) patients
Johnson 2007 ED 55 67 (10) 64% N/A ≥5 months Record review, repeat enzymes CCTA correctly and definitively diagnosed in 93%
Pundziute 2007 OP 100 59 (12) 73% Intermediate Mean: 16 months Record review, clinic visits, survey 1-yr event rate 0% in CCTA (−) patients; 30% in CCTA (+)
Rubinshtein 2007 ED 58 56 (10) 64% Intermediate 12 months Altered strategies, f/u survey Canceled hospitalization in 45%; no events in CCTA (−)
Savino 2006 ED 23 56 (13) 61% N/A ED visit only Record review All significant stenoses on CCTA confirmed by ICA
Hay 2009 OP 138 57 (median) 53% Intermediate Mean: 19.9 months Electronic record review No MACE events in CCTA (−) patients; 8 of 22 CCTA (+) patients revascularized
Wagdi 2009 OP 347 68 (12) 71% Low-to-intermediate Mean: 16 months Clinical visits/phone interviews 90% reduction in rate of normal ICA; 190% reduction in self-referred ICA

CAD: coronary artery disease; RCT: randomized controlled trial; MACE: major adverse cardiovascular event; CCTA: coronary computed tomographic angiography; ED: emergency department; OP: Outpatient