Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;138(3):299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.12.011

Table 6.

Associations between environmental exposures and SEB-induced IL-10. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, and maternal educational level. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, maternal educational level and other covariates excluding residence. Shown are Fold change (FC) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Environmental exposures with significant effects (P < 0.01) are shown in bold. Univar.—univariate analyses; Primary—completed primary education.

Exposure/factor Analysis SEB-induced IL-10
FC 95% CI P value
Age Univar. 0.50 0.33–0.76 0.001
Sex Univar. 1.83 0.023.66 0.09
Maternal education (Illiterate vs. primary) Univar. 0.86 0.362.10 0.75
Residence (urban vs. rural) Univar. 8.56 4.61–15.91 < 0.001
Crowding Model 1 1.26 1.06–1.51 0.01
Model 2 1.35 1.12–1.62 0.002
Piped water Model 1 0.32 0.15–0.68 0.003
 (yes vs. no) Model 2 0.37 0.170.84 0.02
Birth order Model 1 1.08 0.552.13 0.83
 (≥ 3 rd vs. 1st/2nd) Model 2 0.83 0.391.73 0.61
Breast-feeding Model 1 0.80 0.351.74 0.54
 (≥ 13 months vs. ≤ 12 months) Model 2 0.70 0.311.57 0.39
Bathroom Model 1 0.41 0.161.06 0.07
 (field vs. other) Model 2 0.52 0.191.41 0.20
House construction Model 1 1.05 0.472.33 0.91
 (cement vs. wood) Model 2 0.21 0.522.82 0.65
Geohelminth infection Model 1 0.50 0.231.08 0.08
 (yes vs. no) Model 2 0.49 0.241.07 0.07