Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 28;26(2):117–124. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9540-7

Table 2.

Risk factors for type 2 diabetes by low and high metabolic score

Variables Men (294 cases) Women (198 cases)
Low metabolic score High metabolic score P value for difference in HR between groups Low metabolic score High metabolic score P value for difference in HR between groups
HR (95% CI) n = 10,426 HR (95% CI) n = 1,972 HR (95% CI) n = 11,983 HR (95% CI) n = 1,712
Cases of type 2 diabetes (n) 157 137 76 122
Age (10 years) 1.76 (1.64, 2.11) 1.54 (1.36, 1.79) 0.000 1.54 (1.82, 1.8) 1.29 (1.12, 1.48) 0.003
BMI (1SD) 2.28 (1.98, 2.75) 1.59 (1.38, 1.84) 0.000 1.68 (1.40, 2.01) 1.52 (1.30, 1.78) 0.007
Triglycerides (1SD) 1.36 (1.14, 1.64) 1.16 (1.09, 1.23) 0.000 1.34 (1.07, 1.68) 1.17 (1.04, 1.32) 0.000
HDL cholesterol (1SD) 1.02 (0.76, 1.12) 1.01 (0.78, 1.14) 1.06 (0.82, 1.36) 0.75 (0.58, 0.97) 0.000
Hypertension (yes) 1.47 (1.01, 2,15) 0.69 (0.35, 1.41) 0.001 1.86 (1.05,3.30) 1.53 (0.69, 3.42) 0.004
Family history (yes) 2.19 (1.51, 3.16) 2.07 (1.40, 2.98) 2.54 (1.57,4.12) 2.25 (1.55, 3.26)
Education
 College/university ≥ 4 years 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 College/university < 4 years 0.95 (0.53, 1.72) 1.01 (0.61, 2.02) 1.11 (0.43, 2.83) 0.84 (0.45, 1.75)
 High school 1.07 (0.59, 2.01) 1.11 (0.61, 2.01) 1.22 (0.47, 3.12) 0.89 (0.49, 1.87)
 primary and secondary 1.81 (1.19, 2.88) 1.53 (0.77, 1.96) 1.75 (1.09, 4.57) 1.04 (0.69, 1.98)
Leisure-time physical activity
 Hard 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Moderate 0.81 (0.47, 1.39) 0.98 (0.57, 1.70) 0.91 (0.38, 2.10) 0.43 (0.34, 1.22)
 Inactive 1.94 (1.18, 3.36) 1.10 (0.57, 1.79) 1.70 (0.91, 4.33) 0.48 (0.38, 1.28)
Smoking
 Never 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Previous 0.70 (0.42, 1.17) 0.61 (0.38, 1.22) 1.10 (0.56, 2.07) 0.76 (0.45, 1.28)
 Current 1.68 (1.23, 4.25) 1.33 (0.91, 2.14) 1.56 (1.18, 4.18) 1.41 (0.89, 2.47)

The Tromsø Study 1994–2005

Cox’ proportional hazard regression analysis, multivariably adjusted

Low metabolic score: less than 3 metabolic score criteria fulfilled

High score: 3 or more metabolic score criteria fulfilled

For dichotomous variables; HR are given for answering ‘yes’ with ‘no’ as reference

For continuous variables; HR is given for a SD change in the variable

BMI Body mass index, CI confidence interval, HDL high density lipoprotein, HR hazard ratio, SD standard deviation

Differences in HR between groups were determined using interaction terms between variable and group