Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 17;5:9. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00009

Table 3.

Outcome data.

Test Assessment Group
GMT
M(SD)
CTL
M(SD)
SART (n = 10) (n = 8)
Commission errors Baseline 24.80 (14.13) 30.25 (20.82)
Post-intervention 21.20 (15.32) 29.88 (23.44)
Follow-up 17.40 (10.84) 23.14 (21.62)
Omission errors Baseline 30.55 (32.51) 20.25 (15.23)
Post-intervention 11.73 (16.99) 18.21 (19.14)
Follow-up 8.93 (14.17) 22.29 (10.67)
Reaction time Baseline 467.07 (134.23) 421.46 (110.01)
Post-intervention 440.20 (108.95) 405.67 (109.72)
Follow-up 434.08 (92.21) 428.56 (126.50)
Coefficient Baseline 0.29 (0.09) 0.29 (0.07)
of variation Post-intervention 0.26 (0.05) 0.28 (0.11)
Follow-up 0.25 (0.06) 0.28 (0.08)
D–KEFs tower (n = 11) (n = 7)
Total achievement Baseline 13.55 (4.52) 15.63 (4.81)
score Post-intervention 16.64 (3.70) 17.14 (4.81)
Follow-up 19.27 (2.94) 17.71 (3.15)
Rule violation Baseline 0.19 (0.15) 0.11 (0.19)
per item ratio Post-intervention 0.00 (0.00) 0.05 (0.09)
Follow;-up 0.02 (0.04) 0.03 (0.05)
Hotel task (n = 11) (n = 8)
Number of tasks Baseline 4.55 (0.82) 4.38 (1.06)
attempted Post-intervention 4.64 (0.81) 5.0 (0.00)
Follow-up 4.91 (0.30) 4.86 (0.38)
Deviations from Baseline 446.91 (198.04) 473.50 (179.45)
optimal time Post-intervention 699.55 (256.49) 470.88 (159.62)
Follow-up 580.09 (234.55) 706.00 (305.66)
CFQ (n = 11) (n = 8)
Total score Baseline 43.360 (23.14) 52.25 (13.50)
Post-intervention 40.73 (19.13) 54.38 (7.03)
Follow-up 40.18 (20.19) 44.29 (7.76)
DEX (n = 11) (n = 8)
Total score Baseline 27.27 (19.27) 36.38 (10.88)
Post-intervention 25.18 (15.97) 37.13 (13.46)
Follow-up 20.82 (16.58) 32.57 (10.91)
GMT-Q (n = 10) (n = 6)
Total score Baseline 136.30 (88,37) 207.86 (62.62)
Post-intervention 99.55 (69.74) 200.00 (59.27)
Follow-up 106.00 (80.67) 179.71 (76.26)

N's are provided as data were missing for certain measures.

Framed cells indicate significant effects in comparison to baseline for GMT group (p < 0.05).

There were no significant effects for the BHW group.