Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb;163(2):165–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04246.x

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Patient no. Gender Age (years) HLA TNM stages No. of tumours Largest tumour (mm) Child–Pugh KPS Post-TAE Rx
1 M 60 A11 A33 III 5 35 B 100 RFA
2 M 57 A11 A24 III 1 21 B 100 RFA
3 M 57 A11 A31 III 2 39 B 100 RFA
4 M 77 A2 A24 III 2 35 A 100 RFA
5 F 83 A11 A24 III 3 29 B 100 RFA
6 F 74 A2 A24 II 1 35 A 100 RFA
7 F 72 A24 A33 III 3 41 B 100 RFA
8 F 65 A2 A11 II 4 12 B 100 RFA
9 M 71 A2 A11 II 4 16 A 100 RFA
10 M 79 A11 A24 III 2 40 A 100 RFA
11 M 71 A2 A24 II 1 28 A 100 RFA
12 M 56 A2 A26 III 2 25 B 100 RFA
13 M 64 A2 A33 III 2 37 B 100 RFA

M, male; F, female; TNM, tumour–node–metastasis; Child–Pugh, Child–Pugh classification; KPS, Karnofsky performance scores; TAE, transcatheter arterial embolization; Rx, treatment; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HLA, human leucocyte antigen; RFA, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation.