Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropeptides. 2011 Jan 21;45(2):131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2010.12.006

Urocortins are Present in the Rat Testis

Soon Lee 1, Brian Braden 1, Sang Soo Kang 2, Catherine Rivier 1
PMCID: PMC3043384  NIHMSID: NIHMS261881  PMID: 21256589

Abstract

The synthesis and release of testosterone (T) depends both on circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) and on an array of testicular factors whose role remains incompletely understood. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) had been reported in the rat testes, where it was thought to inhibit T secretion. However, the discovery that the CRF-related peptides urocortins (Ucns), of which there are currently 3 subtypes (Ucn 1, 2 and 3), cross-react with many reagents previously used to detect CRF, has cast doubt on this concept. Here we show that while CRF was readily measurable in rat hypothalami (which served as controls), signals for this peptide were barely detectable in total RNA extracted from the testes. On the other hand, microarray, RT-PCR and real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses all indicated strong signals for Ucn 1 in the male gonads, with weaker levels of Ucn 2 and 3 mRNA gene expression. Results obtained for Ucn 1 gene expression were corroborated by immunohistochemical detection, which appeared restricted to Leydig cells. Finally, to investigate possible changes in testicular Ucn 1 levels induced by homeostatic challenges, we measured them in rats exposed to alcohol. We observed that indeed, the intragastric injection of this drug significantly increased testicular Ucn 1, but not Ucn 2, Ucn 3, CRF, CRFR1 or CRFR2 mRNA levels. Collectively, these results provide novel information regarding the presence of CRF-like peptides in the adult male rat testis.

Keywords: Urocortin, testosterone, Leydig cells, gene expression, alcohol

Introduction

The ability of various stressors to inhibit reproductive functions is well recognized {see for example (Breen and Karsch, 2006; Ferin, 1993; Lopez-Calderon et al., 1991; Rivest and Rivier, 1995; Rivier and Rivest, 1991)}. However, the mechanisms responsible for this influence remain surprisingly elusive, particularly in response to stimuli of short duration. We know, of course, that stressors interfere with the synthesis and release of the hypothalamic peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) via the release of a variety of neurotransmitters such as corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) (Rivest et al., 1993; Rivest and Rivier, 1995), prostaglandins (Rivest and Rivier, 1993), opiates, and catecholamines (Dobson et al., 2003; Kalra and Kalra, 1983). Interestingly however, stress-induced decreases in plasma levels of the pituitary hormone luteinizing hormone (LH) are usually relatively slow, and moreover often follow, rather than precede, significant changes in testosterone (T) levels, which can be very rapid (Maric et al., 1996; Orr et al., 1994; Srivastava et al., 1993). This led to the concept that while an important site of action of chronic stressors is hypothalamic GnRH neurons, shorter stimuli may release into the general circulation factors that can penetrate the gonads and act directly on sex steroid-producing cells, or are produced by the gonads themselves. Indeed, the rodent testis harbors a wide array of neurotransmitters and peptides believed to participate in the activity of Sertoli and Leydig cells (Gnessi et al., 1997), including vasopressin (Foo et al., 2001; Howl et al., 1995; Lefebvre and Zingg, 1991), pro-opiomelanocortin-related entities (Bardin et al., 1987; Boitani et al., 1985; Eskeland et al., 1989; Gerendai et al., 1984; Li et al., 1989; Valenca and Negro-Vilar, 1986) and “CRF” (Audhya and Hollander, 1987; Audhya et al., 1989; Dufau et al., 1993; Fabbri et al., 1990; Tinajero et al., 1992; Tortorella et al., 1993; Ulisse et al., 1989; Yoon et al., 1988). In support of the hypothesis that at least some of these compounds might influence gonadal activity, we recently demonstrated that the intratesticular injection of CRF-related peptides, and in particular Ucn 1, significantly inhibited the T response to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (Rivier, 2008).

Several years ago, Dr. Dufau and colleagues reported that CRF exerted a strong inhibitory effect on rat Leydig cell activity (Dufau et al., 1993; Fabbri et al., 1990; Tortorella et al., 1993; Ulisse et al., 1989), while others proposed a stimulatory effect of this peptide on steroidogenesis in the mouse testis (Heinrich et al., 1998; Huang et al., 1995). In addition to this apparent species difference, other results appeared inconsistent. For example, both CRF (Fabbri et al., 1990; Ulisse et al., 1990) and its antibodies (Gerendai et al., 1993) were shown to inhibit T release through a local effect. Another potentially conflicting issue pertained to the nature of the “CRF” that was found in testes and/or thought to influence its activity. Indeed, after CRF was first isolated and characterized (Vale et al., 1981), other structurally related peptides were discovered and named urocortins (Ucns). These Ucns, of which there are currently three (Ucn 1, 2 and 3), show subtype-specific homologies with r/hCRF (Czimmer et al., 2006; Martínez et al., 2004) and affinities to CRF receptors (CRFR) (Donaldson et al., 1996; Vaughan et al., 1995a). Ucn 1 gene expression and/or immunoreactivity have been detected in a variety of peripheral organs (Donaldson et al., 1996; Kageyama et al., 1999; Oki and Sasano, 2004; Vaughan et al., 1995a), with one report stating its presence in mature mouse spermatozoa (Tao et al., 2007). When we became interested in trying to resolve issues linked to the presence and role of CRF-related peptides in the rat testes, we realized that the commercial antibodies that had been used to measure what was then identified as “CRF” in the testes (Tinajero et al., 1992), showed substantial cross-reactivity with Ucn 1, as tested in our laboratory (Vaughan and Vale, unpublished). Also, the CRF antagonist used to investigate the role of this peptide (Frungieri et al., 2002) blocks the receptors that are activated by both Ucn 1 and CRF. It is therefore possible that at least in these studies, the presence of “CRF” in the testes, as well as effects originally attributed to this peptide, were in fact due to Ucn 1. On the other hand, extraction of ovine testes yielded a sequence that was virtually identical to that of ovine hypothalamic CRF (Audhya et al., 1989), which suggested that in this case, true CRF may indeed have been present.

In view of this controversy, we decided to rely on current methodology to examine the presence of CRF-related peptides in the adult male rat testis. Our interest in this question was based in part on our earlier observation that the intratesticular injection of Ucn significantly interfered with the Leydig cell response to human chorionic gonadotropin [Rivier, 2008 #17080]. Using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), qRT-PCR and microarray analysis, we detected Ucn 1, but very little CRF in testicular extracts. Immunohistochemistry was then used to confirm the presence of Ucn 1 in structures thought to be Leydig cells, whereas no CRF immunoreactivity could be detected. Finally, to determine whether testicular Ucn 1 levels were influenced by homeostatic threats, we measured them in rats injected with alcohol intragastrically (ig). On the basis of qRT-PCR and microarray analysis, we found that this drug, which as expected (Rivier et al., 1990; Rivier and Lee, 1996) upregulated CRF mRNA levels in the hypothalamus, also increased testicular gene expression of Ucn 1, but not CRF, Ucn 2, Ucn 3, CRFR1 or CRFR2.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-220 g, Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc, San Diego, CA) were kept under standard light (lights on 0600-1800) and feeding (rat chow and water ad libitum) regimens. Ig surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia 7-10 days before the bioassays. The animals were singly housed after the surgery to prevent chewing of the cannulae. All protocols were approved by the Salk Institute IACUC.

Reagents

Alcohol was diluted with saline to a final injected concentration of <20% (V/V). The dose chosen (4.5 g/kg, ig) induces a moderate degree of intoxication, and blood alcohol levels (BALs) in the range of those typically achieved during binge drinking (Ogilvie and Rivier, 1997), i.e., the range of BALs was 200-250 mg% 1-2 hr after ig alcohol. It also significantly inhibits T release and decreases levels of testicular steroidogenic enzymes (Herman et al., 2006; Selvage et al., 2004).

In vivo protocols

On the morning of the assays, the ig cannulae were connected to saline-filled tubing and the rats were allowed to rest undisturbed for 3 h. Alcohol or its vehicle were then slowly infused ig according to previously published protocols (Ogilvie et al., 1998; Ogilvie et al., 1997; Ogilvie and Rivier, 1997). For microarray analysis, RT-PCR and qRT-PCR, the animals were decapitated 1 and 2 hr after ig injection, and the testes and the brains were quickly removed. RNA was extracted and sent to Gyeongsang National University (Korea) for the microarray experiments, while other RNA samples were processed for RT-PCR and qRT-PCR at the Salk Institute (La Jolla, CA). For Ucn 1 immunohistochemistry, the animals were perfused 1 and 2 hr after the injection of alcohol or vehicle and the testis were processed as described below.

Leydig Cell Isolation

The Leydig cell isolation process has been previously described by Herman and Rivier (2006). Briefly, the testes from rapidly decapitated animals were quickly removed, decapsulated and cleared of large blood vessels. The samples were dispersed in Medium 199 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) that contained 0.1% w/v collagenase and 1.25% w/v BSA (81003, Fraction V, MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH). They were then washed in Medium 199 with BSA and penicillin/streptomycin (GIBCO, Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), suspended in an isotonic Percoll gradient and centrifuged at 4°C for 45 min at 6,500 × g. Semi-purified Leydig cells were then removed from the gradient, washed in heparin dissociation buffer, pelleted and frozen until RNA extraction.

RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from rat testes or semi-purified Leydig cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). To rid the sample of genomic DNA contamination, 30 μg of total RNA was treated with RQ1 DNase (Promega, Madison, WI) for 30 min at 37°C then cleaned on an RNeasy Mini Column (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The concentration and purity of the extracted RNA were determined by measuring the absorbance values at 260 nm and 280 nm with a Beckman DU600 spectrophotometer. One μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) at 37°C for 2 hr. The recommended protocol from Applied Biosystem's RT Kit was followed.

RT-PCR

Rat testes cDNA from the reverse transcription reaction was subjected to PCR containing primers specific to Ucn 1, Ucn 2, Ucn 3, CRF, CRFR1, CRFR2 or the endogenous control GAPDH. The primers used in this study are summarized in Table 1. The 50•μl PCR reaction mixture contained a 1X High Fidelity buffer containing 60 mM Tris-SO4 (pH 8.9) and 18 mM (NH4)2SO4, 2 mM of MgSO4, 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleotide, 1 U of Platinum Taq High Fidelity (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 20 pmoles of both forward and reverse primers, and 2 μl of rat testes cDNA. Negative controls for each primer set were performed by adding water to the reaction in place of cDNA or by the reaction without reverse transcriptase. After preheating the reaction at 94°C for 2 min, denaturing, annealing, and elongation were carried out at 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s, respectively. PCR was carried out for 35 cycles for Ucn 1, Ucn 2, Ucn 3, CRFR1, CRFR2 and 25 cycles for GAPDH. Five μl of the PCR amplification product was subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. A 100-bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used to estimate the band sizes. Images were then taken of the gels and analyzed by Image J software.

Table 1.

Primer sequences for Ucn 1, Ucn 2, Ucn 3, CRFR1, CRFR2 or the endogenous control GAPDH.

Target Gene GenBank Accession Forward primer 5′-3′ Reverse primer 5′-3′ Product Size (b.p.)
Ucn 1 NM_019150 CTCTCCATCTTGCACTGGAT TCAGGAGAACGACAATCGCC 237
Ucn 2 NM_133385 GGTCCTGATGTTGGATAGGG ATGACCTTGTCCGAGCCTTG 238
Ucn 3 XM_574076 AGCACTTCCACCCTAGAGCA CTTTCGACATGGGCCTGTTC 387
CRF NM_OB1019 AGAAAGGGGAAAGGCAAAGA GTTGGAGTCGGCTAAGACTA 309
CRFR1 NM_030999 GCCGCCTACAATTACTTCCA GGAAAGTCCCGAAGAAACAC 501
CRFR2 NM_022714 CTGGAACCTCATCACCACCT CAGTTAGGACCTCTCCTGCT 546
GAPDH NM_017008 AGACAGCCGCATCTTCTTGT TACTGAGATGGGTGCCGTTC 207

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

After synthesis of rat testes cDNA, 2 μl of the 20 μl RT reaction was added to a 10 μl fast RT-PCR reaction. The fast RT-PCR reaction contained TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and a FAM dye-labeled TaqMan MGB probe at 250 nM and two unlabeled PCR primers at 900 nM each for Ucn 1, Ucn 2, Ucn 3, CRFR1, CRFR2, or the endogenous control, β-actin. Primers and probes for the gene expression assay of Ucn 1 (Rn00569682_m1), Ucn 2 (Rn00591306_s1), Ucn 3 (Rn02091611_sl), CRFR1 (Rn00578611_m1), CRFR2 (Rn00575617_m1) and the β-actin endogenous control (4352931E) were pre-designed by Applied Biosystems. Each sample was run in triplicate on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System containing a 384-well block with cycling conditions of 95°C for 20 sec followed by 40 cycles of denaturing at 95°C for 1 sec and annealing and extension at 60°C for 20 sec. Relative expression levels of Ucn 1, Ucn 2, Ucn 3, CRFR1, and CRFR2 were measured using the ••Ct method and the expression levels were calculated as a percentage of the expression levels in vehicle biological replicates.

Microarray RNA Quantity, Integrity and Purity

Total RNA quantity and purity were assessed by measurement of OD260/280 using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. RNA with an A260/280 ratio of >1.8 is considered acceptable for the microarray study. RNA length distribution and integrity were assessed by capillary electrophoresis with fluorescence detection (Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100) using the Agilent Total RNA Nano chip assay (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) for presence of 28S and 18S rRNA bands.

Microarray platform

Gene expression analysis was conducted using the Agilent Whole Rat Genome 4x44K Oligo Microarray Kit. The microarray was designed with four replicates of each probe distributed across the array, that is, 4x44K Multiplex slide format, each of which contains more than about 44,000 rat genes and transcripts sequences including control spots.

RNA Label and Hybridization

Fluorescence-labeled cRNA probes for oligo microarray analysis were prepared by amplification of total RNA in the presence of aminoallyl-UTP using Amino allyl MessageAmpTM aRNA kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX), followed by the coupling of Cy3 or Cy5 dyes (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden).

Hybridizations were performed at 65°C for 17 hr in a rotating hybridization oven using the Agilent 60 mer oligo microarray processing protocol. Slides were washed as indicated in this protocol and then scanned with a GenePix 4000B Array Scanner (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA).

Microarray data analysis

Scanned images were analyzed with GenePix Pro 6.0 software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) to obtain gene expression ratios. Transformed data were normalized by LOWESS regression and analyzed with GeneSpring GX 7.3 software program (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA). With the 1-color default normalization, (per chip: normalize to a median or percentile and per gene: normalize to median), GeneSpring GX first divides each raw intensity value by the median of the chip. Then each value is further divided by the median value of each gene across samples, resulting in the final normalized value.

Gene expression levels and trends in the change of gene expression ratios for hypothalami and testicular CRF and/or CRF-related peptides were analyzed from the normalized microarray data. The criteria used to detect differences in gene expression ratios, which were based on previously published validation (Bullen et al., 2004; Mariani et al., 2003; Sirianni et al., 2005), were >1.4 and <0.6, respectively. When changes answered these criteria, the corresponding signals were further analyzed by RT-PCR, qRT-PCR to confirm the significance of these gene regulation trends. Relative expressions of CRF, Ucn 1 and Ucn 2 in the testis were selected from the normalized values in the control group.

Immunohistochemistry

The rats were injected intraperitoneally (ip) with 100 IU heparin 15 min before perfusing with Bouin's solution for 20 min. Testes were removed and then transferred to 75% ethanol. Testes were embedded into paraffin wax using standard methods at UCSD histology (UCSD, La Jolla, CA). Paraffin embedded testes were cut transversely at a thickness of 5 μm on a rotating microtome (Leica RM2035, Bannockburn, IL) and mounted onto slides. The slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through descending grades of alcohol. Slides were then placed in citrate buffer (10 mM Citric Acid, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) and microwaved for 10 min and then allowed to cool to room temperature. Briefly, the sections were rinsed with 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) between each incubation step. After an initial rinse in PBS, sections were incubated with 0.3% H2O2 for 10 min to block for endogenous peroxidase. The sections were then treated with a blocking solution containing 5% normal goat serum for 1 hr before an overnight incubation with rabbit anti-Ucn 1 (Neat, Abcam) or rabbit anti-steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) (1:1000, Dr. W. L. Miller) primary antibody at 25°C. The sections were then incubated with secondary antibody (biotinylated goat anti-rabbit 1:500, Vector labs, Burlingame, CA) followed by 1 hr incubation with avidin-biotin complex (Vectastain ABC kit, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Following several rinses with PBS, sections were developed with an Ni-DAB solution for 5 min. The immunoperoxidase developing reaction took place with a mixture of 7.5 mg DAB and 0.3 g nickel-ammonium sulfate in 50 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, to which 10 μl of H2O2 had been added. The sections were rinsed with PBS, dehydrated and coverslipped with DPX mounting media (Fluka Biochemika, Ronkonkoma, NY).

Negative control sections that were incubated with the secondary, but not primary antibody, showed no significant immunoreactivity for either Ucn 1 or StAR. Some testicular sections were stained with hematoxylin (H) and eosin (E) to examine the morphology.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM and were analyzed using one- or two-way ANOVA followed by the least square means post hoc test. Differences were considered significant from P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Measurement of CRF-like peptides

Vehicle injection

In the hypothalamus, both CRF and Ucn 1 mRNA levels were readily measured by RT-PCR (Fig. 1), which corresponds to previous reports based on different technologies (Kozicz et al., 1998; Lee and Rivier, 1994; Sawchenko et al., 1984; Vale et al., 1981; Vaughan et al., 1995a). In the testes, on the other hand, CRF was virtually undetectable by microarray (relative expression levels/control: 0.038) and only very low signals were detected by RT-PCR (Fig. 1). However, in agreement with a previous report (Perrin et al., 1995), we found modest levels of CRF receptors type 1 and 2 by RT-PCR or qRT-PCR (not shown). Signals for Ucn 1 were strong when measured by microarray (relative expression levels/control: 1.360) or RT-PCR (Fig. 1), while signals for Ucn 2 were weak (relative expression levels/control: 0.085).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CRF mRNA expression was present in the hypothalamus, but only very low signals were found in the testes (A). In contrast, Ucn 1 mRNA expression was found in both the hypothalamus and the testes (B). Representative gel picture from RT-PCR is shown with 1-4 lanes from rat testes and a negative control (without cDNA or without reverse transcriptase) and two rat hypothalami (HT) as positive controls.

Alcohol injection

In the hypothalamus, microarray data indicated that alcohol induced the expected (Rivier and Lee, 1996) statistically significant increases in CRF gene expression (3.33 and 2.75 fold 1 and 2 hr post-drug administration, respectively) but interestingly, not Ucn 1 or Ucn 2 mRNA levels (Table 2). In contrast, in the testes, this drug significantly (P<0.05-<0.01) upregulated Ucn 1 gene expression regardless of whether RNA levels were measured by microarray (Table 2), RT-PCR or qRT-PCR (Fig. 2). While it also significantly increased Ucn 2 mRNA levels measured by microarray, these data were not corroborated by RT-PCR or qRT-PCR (P > 0.05) (Table 3). This discrepancy might be due to the relatively low expression levels of testicular Ucn 2 mRNA levels, compared to Ucn 1 mRNA levels; testicular Ucn 2 microarray data should thus be viewed with caution. Finally, we did not detect any alcohol-induced changes in testicular mRNA levels for CRF, CRF receptors or Ucn 3 measured by microarray (Table 2), RT-PCR or qRT-PCR (Table 3). The representative RT-PCR gel pictures of Ucn 2 and Ucn 3 are shown also in Figure 2.

Table 2.

Microarray analysis for the hypothalamus and the testes.

Hypothalamus Testes
Gene Ig 1 h ratio (EtOH/CON) Ig 2 h ratio (EtOH/CON) Ig 1 h ratio (EtOH/CON) Ig 2 h ratio (EtOH/CON)
CRF 3.33 2.75 1.35 1.61
CRFR1 0.82 0.81 0.95 1.18
CRFR2 1.17 1.23 0.76 0.83
Ucn 1 0.83 0.67 1.68 2.03
Ucn 2 1.43 1.33 1.95 2.64
CRFBP 0.81 0.92 1.68 1.73
AVPR1a 1.36 2.21 2.6 2.12
AVPR1b 0.7 0.87 2.29 2.66
AVPR2 1.04 1.09 0.98 1.08
AVP-induced 1 1.14 1.11 0.98 0.78
Oxytocin 1.13 1.31 1.15 1.17
Oxytocin R 0.71 0.09 1.32 1.56
NPY 1.07 1.2 0.71 0.73
NPYRY2 0.6 1.08 1.03 1.27
NPYRY5 1 1.25 0.85 0.87
POMC 1 0.9 0.89 0.79
ADH6 1.76 0.87 1.59 1.69

Results are expressed as the ratio of alcohol-treated to control. N = 4-6 rats per group.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Alcohol (4.5 g/kg, ig) significantly (P< 0.05-0.01) increased Ucn 1 mRNA expression in the testes 2 hr later, as measured by RT-PCR (A) and qRT-PCR (B). Representative gel pictures from RT-PCR are shown on the top (Ucn 1) and the bottom (Ucn 2 and Ucn 3). Each bar represents the mean ± sem of 5-6 rats. *, P<0.05, **, P< 0.01 vs. vehicle.

Table 3.

RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analysis for the testes.

RT-PCR (% of vehicle) qRT-PCR (% of vehicle)
Ucn 2 vehicle 100 ± 4.08 100 ± 17.6
EtOH - 1 hr 89.34 ± 7.81 89.83 ± 13.4
EtOH - 2 hr 94.33 ± 11.91 124.86 ± 42.15

Ucn 3 vehicle 100 ± 3.9 100 ± 14.2
EtOH - 1 hr 93.54 ± 15.66 88.2 ± 8.6
EtOH - 2 hr 102.7 ± 13.44 108.6 ± 19.5

CRFR1 vehicle 100 ± 6.42 100 ± 15
EtOH - 1 hr 109.27 ± 13.93 99.07 ± 17.37
EtOH - 2 hr 105.13 ± 7.58 114.52 ± 8.99

CRFR2 vehicle 100 ± 7.71 100 ± 9.37
EtOH - 1 hr 106.93 ± 17.37 93.32 ± 15.16
EtOH - 2 hr 89.17 ± 7.75 118 ± 12.25

Results are expressed as % of vehicle (mean ± sem). N = 4-6 rats per group.

Ucn 1 immunoreactivity (ir) is present in Leydig cells

In order to validate results obtained by microarray or qRT-PCR methodologies and to establish posttranslational processes, we used immunohistochemistry to detect Ucn 1 in the testes after having delineated their morphology with an hematoxylin (H) and eosin (E) stain (Fig. 3, A and D). To further determine if staining for Ucn 1-ir within the lymphatic space of the testes was specific to Leydig cells, we used a rabbit polyclonal antibody against the steroidogenic enzyme StAR. Because of technological issues, results were obtained with serial sections of the gonads, rather than with double immunocytochemistry in identical sections. Whereas StAR-ir was observed in the majority of Leydig cells of the testicular lymphatic space (Fig. 3, B and E), Ucn 1-ir was only localized to a fraction of the cells serially adjacent to those stained positively for StAR (Fig. 3, C and F). Therefore, even though we cannot unambiguously conclude that Ucn 1 was present in StAR-positive cells because double staining was not obtained in identical sections, these results strongly suggest that Ucn 1-ir is localized in some (though not all) Leydig cells. To confirm the presence of Ucn 1 mRNA levels in Leydig cells, we then ran qRT-PCR for Ucn 1 in semi-purified Leydig cells. Ucn 1 gene expression levels in these cells were comparable to those for testicular Ucn-1 gene expression, i.e., the Ct values of Leydig cells and testicular RNA were both within 33-35 cycles, which is covered by the range of the standard curves. In addition, the same size RT-PCR band was obtained from Leydig cells and testicular RNA. These results suggest that indeed, Ucn 1 is present in Leydig cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A, D: Cross section of H and E-stained rat testis showing the morphology of seminiferous tubules and Leydig cells. B, E: Immunohistochemical staining for StAR was used to identify the location of Leydig cells in the testis (StAR-ir positive cells are indicated by black arrows in E). C, F: Some (black arrowheads in F) but not all (white arrowheads in F) structures thought to be Leydig cells are positive for Ucn 1 immunoreactivity. A-C, low-power view of rat testis and boxes indicate the higher magnified views in D-F. Scale bars indicate 50 μm in pictures (A, B, C), and 20 μm in pictures (D, E, F), which are enlarged boxes to show details.

Discussion

As indicated in the Introduction, studies initiated in our laboratory after the identification of the urocortins as new members of the CRF family (Lewis et al., 2001; Reyes et al., 2001; Vaughan et al., 1995b) suggested that the presence and role of CRF itself in the testes might need to be reconsidered. In this paper, we used current technology to measure mRNA levels for CRF and Ucns, as well as their receptors, in the adult male gonad. This approach indicated that only very low signals for CRF gene expression were detected by microarray or RT-PCR methodologies. In the present work, once we detected significant amounts of Ucn 1 mRNA levels by microarray, we used qRT-PCR and RT-PCR to confirm these results and to demonstrate that this gene was present in the testes. Furthermore, we also report the presence of Ucn 1 immunoreactivity in structures directly adjacent to those positive for the steroidogenic enzyme StAR, and therefore believed to be Leydig cells. Previous studies have reported Ucn 1-ir in spermatozoa (Tao et al., 2007) but to our knowledge, the present work is the first to suggest that this peptide may also be found in Leydig cells. With regard to Ucn 2 or 3, published studies performed on peripheral organs indicated their presence in the gastrointestinal tract, the heart, the pancreas, the adrenals, the ovaries and the skin, among others (Lewis et al., 2001; Li et al., 2003; Martinez et al., 2004; Suda et al., 2004; Takahashi et al., 2004; Yamauchi et al., 2005). Using both microarray and qRT-PCR technology, we report here that additionally, low but detectable levels of Ucn 2 and Ucn 3 genes were found in the rat testes.

A final series of experiments was designed to determine whether testicular Ucn levels could be altered by homeostatic threats known to influence Leydig cell activity. We chose the ig injection of alcohol according to a protocol previously shown to interfere with T release (Herman et al., 2006; Rivier, 1999; Selvage et al., 2004). Measurement of hypothalamic signals was used for the sake of comparison. While hypothalamic CRF gene expression was significantly upregulated by alcohol, Ucn 1 was not. There are reports of temporal discrepancies between changes in CRF and Ucn 1 mRNA levels (Smagin et al., 2001). Consequently, as both salt loading (Hara et al., 1997) and restraint (Smagin et al., 2001) appear able to increase hypothalamic Ucn 1 levels, the fact that we only studied the response of this peptide to alcohol at two closely related time points, might have caused us to miss them. In contrast to findings in the brain, both microarray and qRT-PCR methodology indicated that alcohol significantly increased Ucn 1 in the testes. As the intratesticular injection of Ucn 1 blunts the T response to hCG (Rivier, 2008), the upregulated gonadal levels of this peptide might have represented a possible mechanism mediating the inhibitory effect of this drug on Leydig cell activity (Herman et al., 2006; Rivier, 1999; Selvage et al., 2004). However, as we were unable to reverse the influence of alcohol by blocking CRF receptors (Rivier, 2008), the role played by CRF-like peptides in this model remains unresolved.

In conclusion, we report here that microarray and qRT-PCR technologies indicated the presence of the Ucn 1 gene in testicular extracts, where its gene expression is upregulated by alcohol. Additionally, using immunohistochemistry, we localized this peptide within structures thought to be Leydig cells. These results demonstrate that while earlier reports had suggested that CRF was found in the adult rat's gonad, the subsequent discovery of the Ucn family and the development of techniques able to accurately detect these peptides, indicate the predominance of Ucn 1 signals.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Zack Craddock, Camryn Allen, Sarah Im, Cristin Roach, Jonathan Tjong, Thao Dang and Calvin Lau.

Grant Support: The project described was supported by an NRF grant from Korea (R13-2005-012-02001-0) and Award Number AA12810 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosure Summary: S.L., B.B., S.S.K., and C.R. have nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Afshari CA. Perspective: microarray technology, seeing more than spots. Endocrinology. 2002;143:1983–1989. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.6.8865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Audhya T, Hollander CS. Studies on the chemical nature of bioactive CRF in testis and other peripheral tissues. Trans. Assoc. Am. Physicians. 1987;100:62–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Audhya T, Hollander CS, Schlesinger DH, Hutchinson B. Structural characterization and localization of corticotropin-releasing factor in testis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1989;995:10–16. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(89)90226-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardin CW, Chen C-LC, Mororis PL, Gerendai I, Boitani C, Liotta AS, Margioris A, Krieger DT. Proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides in testis, ovary, and tissues of reproduction.. Laurentian Hormone Conference; Montebello, Quebec, Canada. August, 1986; 1987. pp. 1–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boitani C, Chen C-LC, Margioris AN, Gerendai I, Morris PL, Bardin CW. Proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides in the testis: evidence for a possible role in Leydig and Sertoli cell function. Med. Biol. 1985;63:251–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breen KM, Karsch FJ. New insights regarding glucocorticoids, stress and gonadotropin suppression. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2006;27:233–245. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2006.03.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bullen JW, Jr., Ziotopoulou M, Ungsunan L, Misra J, Alevizos I, Kokkotou E, Maratos-Flier E, Stephanopoulos G, Mantzoros CS. Short-term resistance to diet-induced obesity in A/J mice is not associated with regulation of hypothalamic neuropeptides. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004;287:E662–E670. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00114.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Czimmer J, Million M, Tache Y. Urocortin 2 acts centrally to delay gastric emptying through sympathetic pathways while CRF and urocortin 1 inhibitory actions are vagal dependent in rats. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G511–G518. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00289.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dobson H, Ghuman S, Prabhakar S, Smith R. A conceptual model of the influence of stress on female reproduction. Reproduction. 2003;125:151–163. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1250151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Donaldson CJ, Sutton SW, Perrin MH, Corrigan AZ, Lewis KA, Rivier JE, Vaughan JM, Vale WW. Cloning and characterization of human urocortin. Endocrinology. 1996;137:2167–2170. doi: 10.1210/endo.137.5.8612563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dufau ML, Tinajero JC, Fabbri A. Corticotropin-releasing factor: an antireproductive hormone of the testis. FASEB J. 1993;7:299–307. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.2.8382638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eskeland NL, Lugo DI, Pintar JE, Schachter BS. Stimulation of β-endorphin secretion by corticotropin-releasing factor in primary rat leydig cell cultures. Endocrinology. 1989;124:2914. doi: 10.1210/endo-124-6-2914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fabbri A, Tinajero JC, DuFau ML. Corticotropin-releasing factor is produced by rat Leydig cells and has a major local antireproductive role in the testis. Endocrinology. 1990;127:1541–1543. doi: 10.1210/endo-127-3-1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferin M. Stress and the gonadal axis in the female rhesus monkey: interface between the immune and neuroendocrine systems. Hum. Reprod. 1993;8:147–150. doi: 10.1093/humrep/8.suppl_2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Foo N-C, Carter D, Murphy D, Ivell R. Vasopressin and oxytocin gene expression in rat testis. Endocrinology. 2001;128:2118–2128. doi: 10.1210/endo-128-4-2118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Frungieri MB, Zitta K, Pignataro OP, Gonzalez-Calvar SI, Calandra RS. Interactions between testicular serotoninergic, catecholaminergic, and corticotropin-releasing hormone systems modulating cAMP and testosterone production in the golden hamster. Neuroendocrinology. 2002;76:35–46. doi: 10.1159/000063682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gerendai I, Nemeskéri A, Csernus V. Effect of intratesticular administration of anti-corticotropin-releasing factor antiserum (a-CRF) on testicular function in neonatal rats. Andrologia. 1993;25:211–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1993.tb02711.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gerendai I, Shaha C, Thau R, Bardin C. Do testicular opiates regulate leydig cell function. Endocrinology. 1984;115:1645–1647. doi: 10.1210/endo-115-4-1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gnessi L, Fabbri A, Spera G. Gonadal peptides as mediators of development and functional control of the testis: An integrated system with hormones and local environment. Endocrine Rev. 1997;18:541–609. doi: 10.1210/edrv.18.4.0310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hara Y, Ueta Y, Isse T, Kabashima N, Shibuya I, Hattori Y, Yamashita H. Increase in urocortin-like immunoreactivity in the rat hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system after salt loading and hypophysectomy. Neurosci. Lett. 1997;227:127–130. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00327-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heinrich N, Meyer MR, Furkert J, Sasse A, Beyermann M, Bönigk W, Berger H. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) agonists stimulate testosterone production in mouse Leydig cells through CRF receptor-1. Endocrinology. 1998;139:651–658. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.2.5754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Herman M, Kang S, Lee S, James P, Rivier C. Systemic administration of alcohol to adult rats inhibits Leydig cell activity: Time course of effect and role of nitric oxide. Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Res. 2006;30:1479–1491. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Herman M, Rivier C. Activation of a neural brain-testicular pathway lowers Leydig cells levels of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein and the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor while increasing levels of neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Endocrinology. 2006;147:624–633. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Howl J, Rudge SA, Lavis RA, Davies ARL, Parslow RA, Hughes PJ, Kirk CJ, Michell RH, Wheatley M. Rat testicular myoid cells express vasopressin receptors: receptor structure, signal transcuction, and dvelopmental regulation. Endocrinology. 1995;136:2206–2213. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.5.7536665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang B-M, Stocco DM, Hutson JC, Norman RL. Corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulates steroidogenesis in mouse Leydig cells. Biol. Reprod. 1995;53:620–626. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod53.3.620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kageyama K, Bradbury MJ, Zhao L, Blount AL, Vale WW. Urocortin messenger ribonucleic acid: Tissue distribution in the rat and regulation in thymus by lipopolysaccharide and glucocorticoids. Endocrinology. 1999;140:5651–5658. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.12.7223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kalra SP, Kalra PS. Neural regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion in the rat. Endocr. Rev. 1983;4:311–351. doi: 10.1210/edrv-4-4-311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kozicz T, Yanaihara H, Arimura A. Distribution of urocortin-like immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 1998;391:1–10. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980202)391:1<1::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee S, Rivier C. Hypophysiotropic role and hypothalamic gene expression of corticotropin-releasing factor and vasopressin in rats injected with interleukin-1β systemically or into the brain ventricles. J. Neuroendocrinol. 1994;6:217–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1994.tb00575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lefebvre DL, Zingg HH. Novel vasopressin gene-related transcripts in rat testis. Mol. Endocrinol. 1991;5:645–652. doi: 10.1210/mend-5-5-645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lewis K, Li C, Perrin MH, Blount A, Kunitake K, Donaldson C, Vaughan J, Reyes TM, Gulyas J, Fischer W, Bilezikjian L, Rivier J, Sawchenko PE, Vale WW. Identification of urocortin III, an additional member of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family with high affinity for the CRF2 receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:7570–7575. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121165198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li C, Chen P, Vaughan J, Blount A, Chen A, Jamieson P, Rivier J, Smith S, Vale W. Urocortin III is expressed in pancreatic β-cells and stimulates insulin and glucagon secretion. Endocrinology. 2003;144:3216–3224. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li H, Risbridger GP, Funder JW, Clements JA. Effect of ethane dimethane sulphonate on proopiomelanocortin (POMC) mRNA and POMC-derived peptides in the rat testis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1989;65:203–207. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(89)90181-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lopez-Calderon A, Ariznavarreta C, Gonzales-Quijano M, Tresguerres J, Calderon M. Stress induced changes in testis function. J. Steroid Mol. Biol. 1991;40:473–479. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(91)90217-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mariani TJ, Budhraja V, Mecham BH, Gu CC, Watson MA, Sadovsky Y. A variable fold change threshold determines significance for expression microarrays. Faseb J. 2003;17:321–323. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0351fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maric D, Kostic T, Kovacevic R. Effects of acute and chronic immobilization stress on rat leydig cell steroidogenesis. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1996;58:351–355. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(96)00044-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Martinez V, Wang L, Million M, Rivier J, Tache Y. Urocortins and the regulation of gastrointestinal motor function and visceral pain. Peptides. 2004;25:1733–1744. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Martínez V, Wang L, Rivier J, Grigoriadis D, Taché Y. Central CRF, urocortins and stress increase colonic transit via CRF1 receptors while activation of CRF2 receptors delays gastric transit in mice. J. Physiol. 2004;556:221–234. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mong JA, Krebs C, Pfaff DW. Perspective: Micoarrays and Differential Display PCR-Tools for Studying Transcript Levels of Genes in Neuroendocrine Systems. Endocrinology. 2002;143:2002–2006. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.6.8866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ogilvie K, Lee S, Rivier C. Divergence in the expression of molecular markers of neuronal activation in the parvocellular paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus evoked by alcohol administration via different routes. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:4344–4352. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-11-04344.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ogilvie K, Lee S, Rivier C. Role of vasopressin (AVP) and corticotropin-releasing factor in mediating alcohol-induced ACTH and AVP secretion in male rats bearing lesions of the paraventricular nuclei. Brain Res. 1997;744:83–95. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(96)01082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ogilvie K, Rivier C. Effect of three different modes of alcohol administration on the activity of the rat hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Res. 1997;21:467–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb03792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Oki Y, Sasano H. Localization and physiological roles of urocortin. Peptides. 2004;25:1745–1749. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Orr TE, Taylor MF, Bhattacharyya AK, Collins DC, Mann DR. Acute immobilization stress disrupts testicular steroidogenesis in adult male rats by inhibiting the activities of 17 α-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase without affecting the binding of LH/hCG receptors. J. Androl. 1994;15:302–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Perrin M, Donaldson C, Chen R, Blount A, Berggren T, Bilezikian L, Sawchenko P, Vale W. Identification of a second corticotropin-releasing factor receptor gene and charancterization of a cDNA expressed in heart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:2969–2973. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Reyes TM, Lewis K, Perrin MH, Kunitake KS, Vaughan J, Arias CA, Hogenesch JB, Gulyas J, Rivier J, Vale WW, Sawchenko PE. Urocortin II: A member of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) neuropeptide family that is selectively bound by type 2 CRF receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:2843–2848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051626398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rivest S, Plotsky P, Rivier C. CRF alters the infundibular LHRH secretory system from the medial preoptic area of female rats: Possible role of opioid receptors. Neuroendocrinology. 1993;57:236–246. doi: 10.1159/000126365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rivest S, Rivier C. Centrally injected interleukin-1β inhibits hypothalamic LHRH secretion and circulating LH levels via prostaglandins in rats. J. Neuroendocrinol. 1993;5:445–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1993.tb00506.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rivest S, Rivier C. The role of corticotropin-releasing factor and interleukin-1 in the regulation of neurons controlling reproductive functions. Endocr. Rev. 1995;16:177–199. doi: 10.1210/edrv-16-2-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rivier C. Alcohol rapidly lowers plasma testosterone levels in the rat: Evidence that a neural brain-gonadal pathway may be important for decreased testicular responsiveness to gonadotropin. Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Res. 1999;23:38–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1999.tb04021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rivier C, Imaki T, Vale W. Prolonged exposure to alcohol: effect on CRF mRNA levels, and CRF- and stress-induced ACTH secretion in the rat. Brain Res. 1990;520:1–5. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91685-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rivier C, Lee S. Acute alcohol administration stimulates the activity of hypothalamic neurons that express corticotropin-releasing factor and vasopressin. Brain Res. 1996;726:1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rivier C, Rivest S. Effect of stress on the activity of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in the rat. Biol. Reprod. 1991;45:523–532. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod45.4.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rivier CL. Urocortin 1 inhibits rat Leydig cell function. Endocrinology. 2008;149:6425–6432. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sawchenko PE, Swanson LW, Vale WW. Corticotropin-releasing factor: Co-expression within distinct subsets of oxytocin-, vasopressin-, and neurotensinimmunoreactive neurons in the hypothalamus of the male rat. J. Neurosci. 1984;4:1118–1129. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-04-01118.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Selvage D, Hales D, Rivier C. Comparison between the influence of the systemic and central injection of alcohol on Leydig cell activity. Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Res. 2004;28:480–488. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000117839.69352.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sirianni R, Mayhew BA, Carr BR, Parker CR, Jr., Rainey WE. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and urocortin act through type 1 CRH receptors to stimulate dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate production in human fetal adrenal cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;90:5393–5400. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Smagin GN, Heinrichs SC, Dunn AJ. The role of CRH in behavioral responses to stress. Peptides. 2001;22:713–724. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(01)00384-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Soulet D, RIvest S. Perspective: Microarray technology, seeing more than spots. Endocrinology. 2002;143:1983–1989. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.6.8865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Srivastava RK, Taylor MF, Mann DR. Effect of immobilization stress on luteinizing hormone, testosterone, and corticosterone concentrations and on 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity in the testes of adult rats. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. Med. 1993;204:231–234. doi: 10.3181/00379727-204-43658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Suda T, Kageyama K, Sakihara S, Nigawara T. Physiological roles of urocortins, human homologues of fish urotensin I, and their receptors. Peptides. 2004;25:1689–1701. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Takahashi AK, Totsune BK, Murakami CO, Shibahara AS. Urocortins as cardiovascular peptides. Peptides. 2004;25:1723–1731. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tao J, Lin M, Sha J, Tan G, Soong TW, Li S. Separate locations of urocortin and its receptors in mouse testis: Functon in male reproduction and the relevant mechanisms. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2007;19:303–312. doi: 10.1159/000100649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tinajero JC, Fabbri A, Dufau ML. Regulation of corticotropin-releasing factor secretion from Leydig cells by serotonin. Endocrinology. 1992;130:1780–1788. doi: 10.1210/endo.130.4.1312425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tortorella C, Malendowicz LK, Andreis PG, Markowska A, Neri G, Mazzocchi G, Nussdorfer GG. Effects of interleukin-1β on steroidogenesis in Leydig cells of the rat testis: in vivo and in vitro studies. Biomed. Res. 1993;14:209–215. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ulisse S, Fabbri A, Dufau ML. Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors and actions in rat Leydig cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1989;264:2156–2163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ulisse S, Fabbri A, Tinajero JC, Dufau ML. A novel mechanism of action of corticotropin releasing factor in rat Leydig cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:1964–1971. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Vale W, Spiess J, Rivier C, Rivier J. Characterization of a 41 residue ovine hypothalamic peptide that stimulates the secretion of corticotropin and β-endorphin. Science. 1981;213:1394–1397. doi: 10.1126/science.6267699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Valenca MM, Negro-Vilar A. Proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides in testicular interstitial fluid: characterization and changes in secretion after human chorionic gonadotropin or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog treatment. Endocrinology. 1986;118:32–37. doi: 10.1210/endo-118-1-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Vaughan J, Donaldson C, Bittencourt J, Perrin M, Lewis K, Sutton S, Chan R, Turnbull A, Lovejoy D, Rivier C, Rivier J, Sawchenko P, Vale W. Urocortin, a mammalian neuropeptide related to fish urotensin I and to corticotropin-releasing factor. Nature. 1995a;378:287–292. doi: 10.1038/378287a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Vaughan JM, Donaldson C, Bittencourt J, Perrin MH, Lewis K, Sutton S, Chan R, Turnbull A, Lovejoy D, Rivier C, Rivier J, Sawchenko PE, Vale W. Urocortin, a mammalian neuropeptide related to fish urotensin I and to corticotropin-releasing factor. Nature. 1995b;378:287–292. doi: 10.1038/378287a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yamauchi N, Otagiri A, Nemoto T, Sekino A, Oono H, Kato I, Yanaihara C, Shibasaki T. Distribution of urocortin 2 in various tissues of the rat. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2005;17:656–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2005.01354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yoon DJ, Sklar C, David R. Presence of immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing factor in the testis. Endocrinology. 1988;122:759–761. doi: 10.1210/endo-122-2-759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES