Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb;49(2):565–573. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01323-10

Table 4.

Evaluation of the H antigen assay on 500 isolates

Description Explanation No. of isolates % of total
Identified as expected
    Matched traditional serotyping Molecular results matched traditional results completely 402 80.4
    No probe for one or more antigens Possessed an H antigen not detected by the probes currently in the assay, resulting in partial serotype determination 46 9.2
    Monophasic isolates Monophasic by traditional methods; two H antigens detected by molecular method; includes 4 serotype Paratyphi A strains 9 1.8
    Nonmotile isolates Nonmotile variant; H antigen detected in molecular assay matched a common serotype. 4 0.8
    Subtotal 461 92.2
Not identified as expected
    H:m,t and -g,s,t Did not react with t-1 probe; allelic diversity suspected 19 3.8
    H:1,5 Did not react with 5-1 probe; allelic diversity suspected 6 1.2
    H:z All are subspecies IIIb serotypes 6 1.2
    H:m,t Salmonella serotype Pensacola; did not react with m/m,t probe 2 0.4
    H:l,v Salmonella serotype I 9,12:l,v:−; did not react with v probe 2 0.4
    H:d Salmonella serotype Putten; shown to have a divergent H:d allele 1 0.2
    H:1,5,7 Did not react with 5-1 or 7 probe; subspecies II strain 1 0.2
    H:e,n,x,z15 Did not react with x probe; subspecies II strain 1 0.2
    H:z35 Subspecies IIIb strain 1 0.2
    Subtotal 39 7.8
Total 500