Table 15.
Degree of Support of Initial Hypotheses
| HP number | HP Description | Degree of Support | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| HP1 | Whole in-scale PACS have a higher impact on productivity and effectiveness compared to small in-scale PACS | Partial | Shortening of the time frame related to image distribution |
| HP2 | The PACS integration with the radiology department’s diagnostic modalities, RIS/HIS and EMR leverages the overall PACS benefits | PARTIAL | Shortening of the time frame related to image distribution limited to diagnostic modalities integration |
| HP3 | PACS does not impact significantly the number of clinical and technical personnel, but it tends to reduce the administrative one; | Full | |
| however, the impact is strictly related to the organizational process redesign following the introduction of the innovation | Full | ||
| HP4 | PACS reduces the use of consumables and the space dedicated to radiological archive | Full | |
| HP5 | PACS enhances the productivity of the radiological process: both in terms of time spent in specific phases of the process and | Partial | Time reduction confirmed |
| Number of examinations managed | Partial | Increased number of examinations confirmed only in perceptions | |
| HP6 | PACS positively impact in clinical effectiveness in terms of reducing the risk of errors during the diagnostic process | Full | Impact on length of stay unclear |
| HP7 | PACS are generally perceived as useful by radiologists and technicians | FULL | |
| HP8 | The radiology department activities volume is a driver for the decision for PACS adoption | Full |