Table 2.
Results of the Evaluation of User Friendliness
| Parameter | 1st Radiologist | 2nd Radiologist | 1st Radiologist | 2nd Radiologist | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Familiar with the GUI of the Vendor | Not Familiar with the GUI of the Vendor | ||||
| Clarity of interface | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.25 |
| Intelligibility of icons | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Suitability of the interface for radiological case presentations | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Option for defining anatomical regions | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Option for defining hanging of the sequences | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Switching between anatomical regions | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Speed of the software | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.25 |
| Stability in the test phase | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.25 |
| Option for documentation of findings by marking lesions | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1.75 |
| Image export | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |