Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Learn. 2010 Mar;60(1):154–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00554.x

Table 5.

Results of the global ANOVA for noun-article agreement with Group as the comparative factor

Time-windows
350–600 ms 600–900 ms 900–1,200 ms
Low proficiency: Effects across groups
Low proficiency: Group differences
G × V × L × AP (4.42)*
Follow-ups
not significant

End-of-practice: Effects across groups
Midline V (9.43): P** V × L (9.54)**
V (4.91): P* V × L (16.26)*** Medial
V × AP (4.86)* Medial V (4.83): P*
Anterior V (15.43): P*** V × AP (4.63)*
V (7.22): P* Posterior
V (7.51): P*

End-of-practice: Group differences

Note. Results are reported for lateral repeated measures ANOVAs, except when the mid-line is indicated. F values are reported where p < .05. Step-down analyses are reported in italics. V = Violation; L = Laterality; H = Hemisphere; AP = Anterior/Posterior; G = Group; N = Negativity; P = Positivity.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.