Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 Dec 1;10(4):541–551. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.4.541

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The sequential matching paradigm for Experiment 1, in which (a) illustrates a different congruent trial (both the cued target note and an irrelevant note was shifted on the 2nd sequence); and (b) shows a same incongruent trial (the cued target note did not change but an irrelevant note was shifted on the 2nd sequence). (c-d) are examples of the music sequences used in Experiment 2, in which the notes are either (c) connected or (d) disconnected.