Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb;13(2):117–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00255.x

Table 2.

Prevalence of gallbladder diseases and gallstones among symptomatic and asymptomatic persons by districts and gender

District Number USG tested Symptom/gender Total gallbladder diseases (%) 95% CI Gallstones (%) 95% CI
2078 Symptomatic male 5.08a 2.58–7.58 2.25a 1.37–3.14

547 Asymptomatic male 2.06 1.00–3.11 0.99 0.60–1.38

3022 Symptomatic female 8.51a 4.79–12.23 6.41a 3.79–9.04

901 Asymptomatic female 3.56 1.95–5.17 2.87 1.65–4.11

5100 Symptomatic persons (all) 7.12a 2.46–11.76 4.72a 0.19–9.24

1448 Asymptomatic persons (all) 2.99 0.97–5.01 2.31 0.13–4.49

Patna 1086 Male 3.25 1.43–5.07 1.78 0.85–2.72

1309 Female 5.53a 2.45–8.63 5.33a 2.58–8.09

2395 Total 4.50 1.08–7.93 3.73 0.00–7.80

Varanasi 537 Male 4.22 1.97–6.47 1.46 0.72–2.18

1345 Female 6.98a 2.99–10.96 4.29a 1.98–6.59

1882 Total 6.19 1.86–10.52 3.48 0.28–6.68

Vaishali 1002 Male 5.85 2.89–8.81 2.49 1.30–3.68

1269 Female 9.69a 4.66–14.72 7.27a 3.73–1.81

2271 Total 7.99 2.34–13.64 5.15 0.00–10.57

All Districts 2625 Males 4.45 1.13–7.76 1.99 0.69–3.28

3923 Females 7.37a 2.08–12.66 5.59a 1.82–9.37

6548 Total 6.20 0.81–11.59 4.15 0.00–8.76

Note: Estimates were based on logistic analysis carried out separately for gallbladder diseases and gallstones. Explanatory variables in these analyses were gender, symptoms (presence or absence) and district.

a

Differences between male and female prevalence were significant at a 5% level of significance (P < 0.05) in three districts and also among symptomatic and asymptomatic persons.